These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5125730)

  • 1. Acoustic level and vocal effort as cues for the loudness of speech.
    Allen GD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1971 Jun; 49(6):1831-41. PubMed ID: 5125730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bimodal cues for speech loudness.
    Glave RD; Rietveld AC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Oct; 66(4):1018-22. PubMed ID: 512212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of loudness.
    Warren RM
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Dec; 86(4):807-25. PubMed ID: 4803043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relations Between the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise and Psychophysical Measures of Hearing Measured in Four Languages Using the Auditory Profile Test Battery.
    Van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26647417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pure-Tone-Spondee Threshold Relationships in Functional Hearing Loss: A Test of Loudness Contribution.
    Schlauch RS; Han HJ; Yu TJ; Carney E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 27973669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences.
    Grant KW; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1197-208. PubMed ID: 11008820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of loudness cues on respiration in individuals with Parkinson's disease.
    Sadagopan N; Huber JE
    Mov Disord; 2007 Apr; 22(5):651-9. PubMed ID: 17266087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Battmer RD; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic reflex threshold and loudness discomfort.
    Al-Azazi MF; Othman BM
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Mar; 21(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11533793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audibility, speech perception and processing of temporal cues in ribbon synaptic disorders due to OTOF mutations.
    Santarelli R; del Castillo I; Cama E; Scimemi P; Starr A
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt B):200-12. PubMed ID: 26188103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of Gaussian noise on the threshold, dynamic range, and loudness of analogue cochlear implant stimuli.
    Morse RP; Morse PF; Nunn TB; Archer KA; Boyle P
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 17160638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychophysics, fitting, and signal processing for combined hearing aid and cochlear implant stimulation.
    Francart T; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):685-700. PubMed ID: 24165299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of cues to increase sound pressure level on respiratory kinematic patterns during connected speech.
    Huber JE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):621-34. PubMed ID: 17538105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.
    Gosselin PA; Gagné JP
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 21916790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is the effort dependence of speech loudness explicable on the basis of acoustical cues?
    Glave RD; Rietveld AC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1975 Oct; 58(4):875-9. PubMed ID: 1194546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On how the brain decodes vocal cues about speaker confidence.
    Jiang X; Pell MD
    Cortex; 2015 May; 66():9-34. PubMed ID: 25796072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The unity assumption facilitates cross-modal binding of musical, non-speech stimuli: The role of spectral and amplitude envelope cues.
    Chuen L; Schutz M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1512-28. PubMed ID: 27084701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.