These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5126646)

  • 1. Response mechanisms in detection experiments.
    Larkin W
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 Nov; 91(1):140-53. PubMed ID: 5126646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Threshold theories of signal detection.
    Krantz DH
    Psychol Rev; 1969 May; 76(3):308-24. PubMed ID: 5792074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Possible existence of an auditory feedback mechanism at the auditory threshold].
    Molchanov AP; Babkina LN
    Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR; 1977; 237(4):958-61. PubMed ID: 590079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the detection of stepwise changes in a constant signal level.
    Kristofferson AB; Allan LG; Campbell FA
    Percept Psychophys; 1981 Oct; 30(4):362-71. PubMed ID: 7322815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence from auditory simple reaction times for both change and level detectors.
    Burbeck SL; Luce RD
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Aug; 32(2):117-33. PubMed ID: 7145582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection and decision factors in auditory behavior of the elderly.
    Rees JN; Botwinick J
    J Gerontol; 1971 Apr; 26(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 5554313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The temporal course of simultaneous tone-on-tone masking.
    Bacon SP; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Oct; 78(4):1231-5. PubMed ID: 4056217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory thresholds and the effect of reduced auditory feedback of suttering.
    Brown T; Sambrooks JE; MacCulloch MJ
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 1975 Jun; 51(5):297. PubMed ID: 1146589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interaural correlation discrimination: II. Relation to binaural unmasking.
    Durlach NI; Gabriel KJ; Colburn HS; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1548-57. PubMed ID: 3711454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterizing auditory processing and perception in individual listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jepsen ML; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):262-81. PubMed ID: 21303008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A dual-process account of auditory change detection.
    McAnally KI; Martin RL; Eramudugolla R; Stuart GW; Irvine DR; Mattingley JB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Aug; 36(4):994-1004. PubMed ID: 20695713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multimodal signal detection: independent decision vs. integration.
    Mulligan RM; Shaw ML
    Percept Psychophys; 1980 Nov; 28(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 7208258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Loudness and auditory steady-state responses in normal-hearing subjects.
    Zenker Castro F; Barajas de Prat JJ; Larumbe Zabala E
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):269-75. PubMed ID: 18465411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multi-modal hearing: the fundamental importance of the kinociliary servo mechanism and the folly of psychoacoustics. Part III. Psychologists try to capture the unknowable in a net of mathematical equations.
    Tumarkin A
    J Laryngol Otol; 1984 Aug; 98(8):747-57. PubMed ID: 6470571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Models for bimodal signal detection: a reply to Fidell.
    Shaw ML; Mulligan RM
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Jan; 31(1):91-2. PubMed ID: 7070943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MLP: a MATLAB toolbox for rapid and reliable auditory threshold estimation.
    Grassi M; Soranzo A
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Feb; 41(1):20-28. PubMed ID: 19182120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of TEOAE and DPOAE measurements for the assessment of auditory thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Suckfüll M; Schneeweiss S; Dreher A; Schorn K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1996 Jul; 116(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 8831837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory backward-masking performance by children who stutter and its relation to dysfluency rate.
    Howell P; Rosen S; Hannigan G; Rustin L
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Apr; 90(2):355-63. PubMed ID: 10833723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Threshold models of temporal-order judgments evaluated by a ternary response task.
    Ulrich R
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Sep; 42(3):224-39. PubMed ID: 3671048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.