These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A comparison of family planning programs in Iran and Turkey. Fendall NR HSMHA Health Rep; 1971 Nov; 86(11):1011-24. PubMed ID: 5138279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Philippines: family planning acceptors, January-June 1970. Laing JE Stud Fam Plann; 1971 May; 2(5):113-9. PubMed ID: 5113352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Population and family planning programs: a factbook. Nortman D Rep Popul Fam Plann; 1969 Oct; ():1-48. PubMed ID: 5406198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An IUD follow-up study in Potharam, Thailand. Vimuktanon S; Rosenfield AG Stud Fam Plann; 1971 Aug; 2(8):166-70. PubMed ID: 5164350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Experience in Mexico with intrauterine hormone contraceptive (3 years of study)]. Martínez-Manautou J; Correu-Azcona S; Aznar Ramos R Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1976 Jul; 40(237):61-77. PubMed ID: 780216 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Mexican experience with postpartum-postabortion programs, 1970-1972. Keller A; Rabago de Rodriguez A; Correu S Stud Fam Plann; 1974 Jun; 5(6):195-200. PubMed ID: 4842692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Postpartum contraceptive acceptance in León, Mexico: a multivariate analysis. Romero-Gutiérrez G; Garcia-Vazquez MG; Huerta-Vargas LF; Ponce-Ponce de Leon AL Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2003 Dec; 8(4):210-6. PubMed ID: 15006268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Canadian county-sponsored family planning. 3. A second survey. Tyson JE; Washburn HH Obstet Gynecol; 1970 Mar; 35(3):377-80. PubMed ID: 5416702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Contraceptive technology from the administrator's perspective]. Caram M Familia; 1984; 2(2):4-8. PubMed ID: 12178195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences in contraceptive choice among female adolescents at a state-funded family planning clinic. Heavey EJ; Moysich KB; Hyland A; Druschel CM; Sill MW J Midwifery Womens Health; 2008; 53(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 18164433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Study of family planning. V. Contraceptive methods in women]. Castelazo-Ayala L; Zárate-Treviño A Gac Med Mex; 1968 Sep; 98(9):1138-47. PubMed ID: 5719858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Attitudes of 30 American Indian women toward birth control. Doran CM Health Serv Rep; 1972; 87(7):658-63. PubMed ID: 5071316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. General observations from five years of use of antifertility agents in a public hospital. Swartz DP; Cho YS; Felton HT Int J Fertil; 1968; 13(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 5700389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Change in contraceptive choices and the effect of education on use of contraception at the family planning clinic of Sişli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. Baksu A; Gunes G; Aki G; Tuysuz F; Goker N Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2005 Jun; 10(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 16147814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An experience in family planning in Nairobi. Hornsby VP East Afr Med J; 1972 Oct; 49(10):714-24. PubMed ID: 4665997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fertility decline and contraceptive use in the International Postpartum Family Planning Program. Sivin I Stud Fam Plann; 1971 Dec; 2(12):248-56. PubMed ID: 5164392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of births averted by family planning programs: the parity approach. Kelly WJ Stud Fam Plann; 1971 Sep; 2(9):197-201. PubMed ID: 5128534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Report on the 8th world congress of the International Planned Parenthood Federation, IPPF]. Richter RH Praxis; 1967 Oct; 56(41):1395-400. PubMed ID: 5633080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]