These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5128533)
21. Medical, legal, and social implications of contraceptives for teenagers. Daniels AM Child Welfare; 1971 Mar; 50(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 5164339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Attitudes toward family planning and contraception in Mexico City. van Keep PA; Rice-Wray E Stud Fam Plann; 1973 Nov; 4(11):305-9. PubMed ID: 4749102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Post family planning acceptance experience in the Caribbean: St. Kitts-Nevis and St. Vincent. Bailey J; Keller A Stud Fam Plann; 1982 Feb; 13(2):44-58. PubMed ID: 7147313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of oral progestogens for contraception in Indian women. A four-year study. Shah PN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1969 Oct; 105(4):512-6. PubMed ID: 5824867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Social marketing program sales. Soc Mark Forum; 1984; 1(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 12266334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Perspectives for the development of new contraceptives. Matlin SA Soc Biol Hum Aff; 1984; 49(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 12340738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Methods for estimating future caseloads of family planning programs. Reynolds J Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Apr; 3(2):56-61. PubMed ID: 5098789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Family planning in a suburban development of Mexico City]. Gutiérrez Avila JH; González Cortés A; González Cortés A Salud Publica Mex; 1982; 24(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 7089701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Orleans parish family planning demonstration program: a description of the first year. Beasley JD; Frankowski RF; Hawkins CM Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1969 Jul; 47(3):225-53. PubMed ID: 5806218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. New findings from old data. Arong JR Options Policy Pract; 1976 Apr; 2(2):1-12. PubMed ID: 12263496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Oral contraceptives: Pt. 2. Family Planning Association of New South Wales Fam Plann Inf Serv; 1978; 1(2):1-36. PubMed ID: 12338652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The impact of demand factors, quality of care and access to facilities on contraceptive use in Tanzania. Arends-Kuenning M; Kessy FL J Biosoc Sci; 2007 Jan; 39(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 16359581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Birth control overseas]. Cazenave JC; Courbil LJ; Barnaud P; Bertram P Med Trop (Mars); 1983; 43(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 6855532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Survey report: Ecuador. Kent MM Popul Today; 1987 Dec; 15(12):5. PubMed ID: 12341909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Canadian county-sponsored family planning. II. Twelve-month review. Tyson JE; Washburn HH; Tindale E Obstet Gynecol; 1967 Dec; 30(6):875-80. PubMed ID: 6061840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. tudies of family planning in the Quinta Normal District of Santiago. The use of contraceptives. Requena M Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1965 Oct; 43(4):Suppl:69-99. PubMed ID: 5888519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Pregnancy after contraceptive use. Ang Eng Suan ; Arshat H Malays J Reprod Health; 1986 Jun; 4(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 12268570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A reputation for quality care. JOICFP News; 1995 Feb; (248):4. PubMed ID: 12288394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. IUD rejected cases: an example of clinic and client experiences in East Pakistan. Miller RA; Croley HT; Roberts BJ; Haider SJ Pak J Fam Plann; 1968; 2(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 12254789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]