These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 513043)

  • 21. [Clinical use of central electronic monitoring system].
    Guo X; Xu H; Xie K
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 11831942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Cardiotocographic monitoring of the fetus in pregnancy complicated by hypertension].
    Moneta E; Militello G; Romanini C; Oliva GC; Bompiani A
    Minerva Ginecol; 1978; 30(1-2):13-25. PubMed ID: 643234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Role of cardiotocography.
    Spencer JA
    Br J Hosp Med; 1992 Jul 1-28; 48(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 1504694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The management of high risk pregnancy.
    Anuman-Rajadhon Y; Pattanachak C; Manassakorn J
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1978 Oct; 61(10):576-85. PubMed ID: 712279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Application of intrapartum fetal oxygen saturation rate monitoring].
    Han FZ; Bian XM; Gai MY; Liu JT; Yang JQ
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2003 Dec; 25(6):685-8. PubMed ID: 14714312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of fetal heart-rate variability interpretation by obstetricians using the criteria of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development compared with computer-aided interpretation.
    Tongsong T; Iamthongin A; Wanapirak C; Piyamongkol W; Sirichotiyakul S; Boonyanurak P; Tatiyapornkul T; Neelasri C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Feb; 31(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 15669996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Effect of an acoustic stimulus on the reactivity of a fetus in distress (a preliminary report)].
    Uzunova N; Todorova R; Petrova N; Konstantinova T
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1987; 26(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 3592106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Fetal admission test and fetal heart rate response to vibratory stimuli test].
    Wu L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1995 Oct; 30(10):633-5. PubMed ID: 8745511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Auscultation of the fetal heart presents advantages over electronic monitoring.
    Sandmire HF; DeMott RK
    Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):661-3. PubMed ID: 8571614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Interpretation of the fetal heart rate in pregnancy and labor].
    Künzel W; Hohmann M
    Gynakologe; 1984 Dec; 17(4):255-64. PubMed ID: 6519556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fetal heart rate monitoring casebook. Fetal heart rate monitoring and severe placental abruption.
    Gimovsky ML
    J Perinatol; 1991 Sep; 11(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 1919832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intrapartum fetal monitoring today.
    Schwartz N; Young BK
    J Perinat Med; 2006; 34(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 16519612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A review of the 2008 NICHD Research Planning Workshop: recommendations for fetal heart rate terminology and interpretation.
    Hankins GD; Miller DA
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 21278495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Electronic monitoring of fetal heart rate and determination of fetal scalp blood pH in prediction of intrapartum fetal distress.
    Dai MS; Fox H
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1991 Feb; 104(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 1874012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of the auscultated acceleration test and the nonstress test as predictors of perinatal outcomes.
    Paine LL; Benedict MI; Strobino DM; Gegor CL; Larson EL
    Nurs Res; 1992; 41(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 1549525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hemoglobin S-C disease and fetal well-being: a case report.
    Chanelles O; Koskas M; Chitrit Y; Riehl-Duvinage C; Saint-Leger S
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 May; 22(5):465-8. PubMed ID: 19530008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How to read fetal monitoring records.
    Young BK
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1980; 44():133-49. PubMed ID: 7393930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The rationale for antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Schifrin BS
    J Reprod Med; 1979 Nov; 23(5):213-21. PubMed ID: 513046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The fetal monitoring polemic.
    Schifrin BS
    Clin Perinatol; 1982 Jun; 9(2):399-408. PubMed ID: 6749379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.