These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5130783)

  • 1. [Comparative examination between audiovisual, auditory and visual speech perception].
    Ewertsen HW; Nielsen B
    Nord Med; 1971 Sep; 86(35):1028. PubMed ID: 5130783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audio-visual speech perception. A preliminary report.
    Ewertsen HW; Nielsen HB; Nielsen SS
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1969; 263():229-30. PubMed ID: 4193229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. McGurk effects in cochlear-implanted deaf subjects.
    Rouger J; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1188():87-99. PubMed ID: 18062941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Study of visual and auditory perception in children with delayed speech development].
    Lasserre N
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1967; 88(7):501-38. PubMed ID: 5618480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
    Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing binaural/bimodal advantages using auditory event-related potentials in subjects with cochlear implants.
    Sasaki T; Yamamoto K; Iwaki T; Kubo T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Oct; 36(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 19297109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An exploration of why preschoolers perform differently than do adults in audiovisual speech perception tasks.
    Desjardins RN; Rogers J; Werker JF
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Jul; 66(1):85-110. PubMed ID: 9226935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exposure to asynchronous audiovisual speech extends the temporal window for audiovisual integration.
    Navarra J; Vatakis A; Zampini M; Soto-Faraco S; Humphreys W; Spence C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 25(2):499-507. PubMed ID: 16137867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sequential audiovisual interactions during speech perception: a whole-head MEG study.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Menning H; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(6):1342-54. PubMed ID: 17067640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audiovisual perception of speech in noise and masked written text.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 18091101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students.
    Borg E; Samuelsson E; Danermark B; Rönnberg J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of visual and auditory information on the perception of speech and non-speech oral movements in patients with left hemisphere lesions.
    Schmid G; Thielmann A; Ziegler W
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2009 Mar; 23(3):208-21. PubMed ID: 19283578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contributions of oral and extraoral facial movement to visual and audiovisual speech perception.
    Thomas SM; Jordan TR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):873-88. PubMed ID: 15462626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The standard in evaluation of the variation of the hearing acuity].
    Mori M
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1967 Nov; 70(11):1828-46. PubMed ID: 5187288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychophysical tests of vision and hearing in patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Regan D
    Adv Neurol; 1981; 31():217-37. PubMed ID: 7325044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing lips: gamma-band activity during audiovisual speech perception.
    Kaiser J; Hertrich I; Ackermann H; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 May; 15(5):646-53. PubMed ID: 15342432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. IDENTIFICATION AND DISCRIMINATION FUNCTIONS FOR A VISUAL CONTINUUM AND THEIR RELATION TO THE MOTOR THEORY OF SPEECH PERCEPTION.
    CROSS DV; LANE HL; SHEPPARD WC
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jul; 70():63-74. PubMed ID: 14315132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why seeing is believing: merging auditory and visual worlds.
    Witten IB; Knudsen EI
    Neuron; 2005 Nov; 48(3):489-96. PubMed ID: 16269365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.