These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5134327)

  • 1. Facilitation of stereoscopic depth perception by a relative-size cue in ambiguous disparity stereograms.
    Fineman MB
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 Oct; 90(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 5134327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interaction of stereo, texture and outline cues in the shape perception of three-dimensional ridges.
    Buckley D; Frisby JP
    Vision Res; 1993 May; 33(7):919-33. PubMed ID: 8506635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues.
    Harwerth RS; Moeller MC; Wensveen JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The dichoptiscope: an instrument for investigating cues to motion in depth.
    Howard IP; Fukuda K; Allison RS
    J Vis; 2013 Dec; 13(14):. PubMed ID: 24297775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Depth scaling in phantom and monocular gap stereograms using absolute distance information.
    Kuroki D; Nakamizo S
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(25):4206-16. PubMed ID: 17045325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binocular depth reversals despite familiarity cues.
    van den Enden A; Spekreijse H
    Science; 1989 May; 244(4907):959-61. PubMed ID: 2727687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Depth cue integration: stereopsis and image blur.
    Mather G; Smith DR
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(25):3501-6. PubMed ID: 11115677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stereoscopic size-distance relationships from line-drawn and dot-matrix stereograms.
    Lawson RB; Gulick WL; Park M
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Jan; 92(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 5059183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between apparent depth and disparity in rivalrous-texture stereograms.
    Frisby JP; Mayhew JE
    Perception; 1978; 7(6):661-78. PubMed ID: 740507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Further consideration of size illusions in random dot stereograms.
    Greene E; Gentner S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Aug; 93(1):205-12. PubMed ID: 11693687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motion perception during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms.
    Erkelens CJ; Collewijn H
    Vision Res; 1985; 25(4):583-8. PubMed ID: 4060612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The familiar-size cue to distance and stereoscopic depth perception.
    Predebon J
    Perception; 1993; 22(8):985-95. PubMed ID: 8190600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robust cue integration: a Bayesian model and evidence from cue-conflict studies with stereoscopic and figure cues to slant.
    Knill DC
    J Vis; 2007 May; 7(7):5.1-24. PubMed ID: 17685801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stereoscopic Slant Contrast and the Perception of Inducer Slant at Brief Stimulus Presentations.
    Harada S; Mitsudo H
    Perception; 2018 Feb; 47(2):171-184. PubMed ID: 29117775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian combination of ambiguous shape cues.
    Adams WJ; Mamassian P
    J Vis; 2004 Nov; 4(10):921-9. PubMed ID: 15595895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards a new explantation for the geometrical illusions. II. Apparent depth or contour proximity?
    Fisher GH
    Br J Psychol; 1973 Nov; 64(4):607-21. PubMed ID: 4757896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binocular utilization of monocular cues that are undetectable monocularly.
    Julesz B; Oswald HP
    Perception; 1978; 7(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 693231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ordinal configural cues combine with metric disparity in depth perception.
    Burge J; Peterson MA; Palmer SE
    J Vis; 2005 Jun; 5(6):534-42. PubMed ID: 16097866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cue conflict between disparity change and looming in the perception of motion in depth.
    González EG; Allison RS; Ono H; Vinnikov M
    Vision Res; 2010 Jan; 50(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 19909770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Depth from shading and disparity in humans and monkeys.
    Zhang Y; Weiner VS; Slocum WM; Schiller PH
    Vis Neurosci; 2007; 24(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 17640412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.