These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. A robust asymmetry in loudness between rising- and falling-intensity tones. Ponsot E; Susini P; Meunier S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):907-20. PubMed ID: 25609028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. On loudness at threshold. Buus S; Müsch H; Florentine M J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):399-410. PubMed ID: 9670532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Investigation of the relationship between adaptation measured binaurally and monaurally. Weiler EM; Linz J; Mojdehi R; Glass EB Br J Audiol; 1979 May; 13(2):47-50. PubMed ID: 486810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Tone decay for hearing-impaired listeners with and without dead regions in the cochlea. Huss M; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Dec; 114(6 Pt 1):3283-94. PubMed ID: 14714809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A Bekesy descending-only procedure: effects of attenuation rate and step size, and starting level. Young IM; Lowry LD; Menduke H J Aud Res; 1985 Oct; 25(4):201-8. PubMed ID: 3843096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Loudness and the acoustic reflex: cochlear-impaired listeners. Keith RW J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 511665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Loudness of subcritical sounds as a function of bandwidth, center frequency, and level. Hots J; Rennies J; Verhey JL J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 24606270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Simple reaction time for broadband sounds compared to pure tones. Schlittenlacher J; Ellermeier W; Avci G Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):628-636. PubMed ID: 27878557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effects of bandwidth and stimulus type on most comfortable loudness levels of hearing-impaired listeners. Byrne D J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):484-93. PubMed ID: 3745681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Relations Between the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise and Psychophysical Measures of Hearing Measured in Four Languages Using the Auditory Profile Test Battery. Van Esch TE; Dreschler WA Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26647417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Acoustic reflex threshold and loudness discomfort. Al-Azazi MF; Othman BM Saudi Med J; 2000 Mar; 21(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11533793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Louder sounds can produce less forward masking: effects of component phase in complex tones. Gockel H; Moore BC; Patterson RD; Meddis R J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):978-90. PubMed ID: 12942977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Loudness recalibration as a function of level. Mapes-Riordan D; Yost WA J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3506-11. PubMed ID: 10615690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Induced loudness reduction as a function of exposure time and signal frequency. Wagner E; Scharf B J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Feb; 119(2):1012-20. PubMed ID: 16521763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. In situ Hearing Tests for the Purpose of a Self-Fit Hearing Aid. Boymans M; Dreschler WA Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 28434002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Feasibility of an objective electrophysiological loudness scaling: a kernel-based novelty detection approach. Mariam M; Delb W; Schick B; Strauss DJ Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jul; 55(3):185-95. PubMed ID: 22592125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]