These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 513811)
101. A note on exact solutions of two prey-predator equations. Burnside RR Bull Math Biol; 1982; 44(6):893-7. PubMed ID: 7159791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
102. The existence of stable equilibria in Volterra predator-prey systems represented by loop graphs. Solimano F Bull Math Biol; 1985; 47(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 4084687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
103. A stochastic foraging model with predator training effects: I. Functional response, switching, and run lengths. McNair JN Theor Popul Biol; 1980 Apr; 17(2):414-66. PubMed ID: 7404444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
105. Propagation of infection and the prey-predator interplay. Zhdanov VP J Theor Biol; 2003 Dec; 225(4):489-92. PubMed ID: 14615207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
106. Application of search theory to the analysis of prey aggregation as an antipredation tactic. Kiltie RA J Theor Biol; 1980 Nov; 87(1):201-6. PubMed ID: 7206747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
107. A stone's throw and its launch window: timing precision and its implications for language and hominid brains. Calvin WH J Theor Biol; 1983 Sep; 104(1):121-35. PubMed ID: 6632930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
108. The value of fat reserves and the tradeoff between starvation and predation. McNamara JM; Houston AI Acta Biotheor; 1990 Mar; 38(1):37-61. PubMed ID: 2109917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
109. The physical dimensions and biological meaning of the coefficients in the Volterra competition equations and their consequences for the possibility of coexistence. Walker I Acta Biotheor; 1983; 32(2):93-122. PubMed ID: 6415980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
110. [How predators select their prey]. Curio E Naturwissenschaften; 1977 Nov; 64(11):575-8. PubMed ID: 593401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
111. The role of early sensory experience in the prey catching responses of Salamandra salamandra to stationary prey. Roth G; Luthardt G Z Tierpsychol; 1980; 52(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 7386069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
112. Coexistence of two competitors on one resource. Armstrong RA; McGehee R J Theor Biol; 1976 Feb; 56(2):499-502. PubMed ID: 944840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
115. On optimal diet in a patchy environment. Heller R Theor Popul Biol; 1980 Apr; 17(2):201-14. PubMed ID: 7404440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
116. Holling's "hungry mantid" model for the invertebrate functional response considered as a Markov process. III. Stable satiation distribution. Heijmans HJ J Math Biol; 1984; 21(2):115-43. PubMed ID: 6543451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
117. The advantage of spacing-out. Taylor J J Theor Biol; 1976 Jul; 59(2):485-90. PubMed ID: 957702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
118. The prey localisation model: a stability analysis. Chipalkatti R; Arbib MA Biol Cybern; 1987; 57(4-5):287-99. PubMed ID: 3689837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]