These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5139356)

  • 1. Comparison of scores on Quick Test and Stanford-Binet, Form L-M.
    Joesting J; Joesting R
    Psychol Rep; 1971 Dec; 29(3):1178. PubMed ID: 5139356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Quick Test and the Stanford-Binet, Form L-M for institutionalized mentally retarded adults.
    Lambirth TT; Panek PE
    Psychol Rep; 1982 Dec; 51(3 Pt 2):1065-6. PubMed ID: 7167604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition and the WISC--R for children in the lower range of intelligence.
    Lukens J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):819-22. PubMed ID: 2377415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparisons of scors on quick test and Stanford-Binet, form L-M, for retarded children.
    Lamp RE; Barclay A
    Psychol Rep; 1968 Oct; 23(2):401-2. PubMed ID: 5698788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extrapolated Stanford-Binet IQs for mentally retarded and mentally gifted individuals.
    Silverstein AB
    Psychol Rep; 1980 Jun; 46(3 Pt 1):900-2. PubMed ID: 7394105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abbreviated forms of the Stanford-Binet, L-M: reliability and effects on classification of institutionalized mentally retarded adults.
    Panek PE; Haack R
    Psychol Rep; 1979 Oct; 45(2):676-8. PubMed ID: 538193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extrapolated Stanford-Binet IQs for severely and profoundly retarded adults.
    Durham TW
    Psychol Rep; 1985 Feb; 56(1):189-90. PubMed ID: 3983312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of two short forms of the Stanford-Binet, form L-M, for use with a child guidance population.
    Gayton WF
    Psychol Rep; 1971 Apr; 28(2):355-7. PubMed ID: 5581874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing scores on the Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition with the WISC-R for exceptional children.
    Hollinger CL; Baldwin C
    Psychol Rep; 1990 Jun; 66(3 Pt 1):979-84. PubMed ID: 1696017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the Stanford-Binet abbreviated and complete forms for developmentally disabled children.
    Bloom AS; Klee SH; Raskin LM
    J Clin Psychol; 1977 Apr; 33(2):477-82. PubMed ID: 870534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of cognitive deficiency with the McCarthy Scales and Stanford-Binet: a correlational analysis.
    Levenson RL; Zino TC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Feb; 48(1):291-5. PubMed ID: 450631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re-evaluation of the use of the Quick Test with a sample of institutionalized mentally retarded subjects.
    Maloney MP; Ward MP; Schenck HU; Braucht GN
    Psychol Rep; 1971 Dec; 29(3):1155-9. PubMed ID: 5139353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlations between the quick test and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Revised.
    Nicholson CL
    Psychol Rep; 1977 Apr; 40(2):523-6. PubMed ID: 859975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concurrent validity of the Quick test.
    Sawyer RN; Whitten JR
    Psychol Rep; 1972 Feb; 30(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 5012641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of PPVT-R and WISC-R in a mild/moderate handicapped sample.
    Beck FW; Black FL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Jun; 62(3):891-4. PubMed ID: 3725526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of preschoolers at-risk with the WPPSI--R and the Stanford-Binet L-M.
    Gerken KC; Hodapp AF
    Psychol Rep; 1992 Oct; 71(2):659-64. PubMed ID: 1410125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intellectual evaluations of children using human figure drawings: an empirical investigation of two methods.
    Abell SC; von Briesen PD; Watz LS
    J Clin Psychol; 1996 Jan; 52(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 8682914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential validity of the K-ABC for lower functioning preschool children versus those of higher ability.
    Bloom AS; Allard AM; Zelko FA; Brill WJ; Topinka CW; Pfohl W
    Am J Ment Retard; 1988 Nov; 93(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 3228519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition: a small study of concurrent validity.
    Hollinger CL; Baldwin C
    Psychol Rep; 1990 Jun; 66(3 Pt 2):1331-6. PubMed ID: 2385722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of McCarthy General Cognitive Indexes and Stanford-Binet IQs for educable mentally retarded children.
    Naglieri JA; Harrison PL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Jun; 48(3 Pt 2):1251-4. PubMed ID: 492899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.