These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. [Contribution of cortical-ERA in the evaluation of occupational deafness]. Galán Cortés JC; Beagley HA; Suárez Nieto C; Gutiérrez González A An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am; 1986; 13(1):65-81. PubMed ID: 3706680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. [Evaluation of hearing in members of a wind instrument orchestra]. Haralampiev K; Petrović D Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1979 Apr; 107(4):367-71. PubMed ID: 531669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. [Development of the incidence of chronic occupational acoustic trauma as a factor of work disability (a metropolitan area in Chile, 1971-1982)]. Prenafeta J; Valenzuela A Rev Med Chil; 1984 Jun; 112(6):604-8. PubMed ID: 6515176 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. [Monitoring of subjects to noise risk. Proposed methods of audiometric classification]. Catenacci G; Terzi R; Marcaletti G; Prestinoni A; Capodaglio E Med Lav; 1981; 72(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 7029233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. [Observations on the organization of audiometry facilities in workplaces with extreme noise levels]. Turay J Cesk Otolaryngol; 1987 May; 36(3):170-2. PubMed ID: 3652236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. [Hearing in workers under 30 years of age after 10 years' work in a noisy environment]. Marková M Cesk Otolaryngol; 1987 Jul; 36(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 3664700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. The comparison of different calculation formulas for the interpretation of the pure-tone audiometry in the evaluation of professional hearing-loss. Lahaye D; Pattyn J Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1980; 34(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 7234373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [On the evaluation of the inverse reactions in the Gellé test with air conduction]. Pálfalvi L Acta Otolaryngol; 1968 Dec; 66(6):508-14. PubMed ID: 5732653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [Extended high frequency audiometry in the prevention of noise-induced hearing loss]. Somma G; Coppeta L; Magrini A; Parrella M; Cappelletti MC; Gardi S; Messina M; Bergamaschi A; G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2007; 29(3 Suppl):258-60. PubMed ID: 18409674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Relation between occupational noise-induced hearing loss and presbycusis]. Tománek R Cesk Otolaryngol; 1987 Mar; 36(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 3581224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Noise-induced hearing loss. Unmasking other pathology. Zalin H Proc R Soc Med; 1971 Feb; 64(2):187-90. PubMed ID: 4251359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [Dosimetric evaluation of noise and results of the audiometric examination of a selected group of workers in the refinery-petrochemical industry]. Latkowski B; Zalewski P; Sułkowski W; Puzio J Med Pr; 1987; 38(6):466-70. PubMed ID: 3451021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Occupational hearing loss: new diagnostic opportunities]. Sułkowski WJ; Guzek WJ; Kowalska S; Matyja W; Sward-Matyja M Med Pr; 2002; 53(6):457-9. PubMed ID: 12701535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]