These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5142063)

  • 1. Modality, difficulty, and "coupling" in vigilance behavior.
    Loeb M; Binford JR
    Am J Psychol; 1971 Dec; 84(4):529-41. PubMed ID: 5142063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The anterior N1 component as an index of modality shifting.
    Töllner T; Gramann K; Müller HJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1653-69. PubMed ID: 18767917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory motion affects visual biological motion processing.
    Brooks A; van der Zwan R; Billard A; Petreska B; Clarke S; Blanke O
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):523-30. PubMed ID: 16504220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Matching auditory and visual series: modality problem or translation problem?
    Goodnow JJ
    Child Dev; 1971 Oct; 42(4):1187-201. PubMed ID: 5157110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
    Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual and auditory conditional position discrimination in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
    Martinez L; Matsuzawa T
    Behav Processes; 2009 Sep; 82(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 19615618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of method of presentation, modes and response category knowledge of results on detection performance in a vigilance task.
    Ware JR; Baker RA
    J Eng Psychol; 1964 Oct; 3(4):111-6. PubMed ID: 5878152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitoring performance with a time-shared encoding task.
    Tyler DM; Halcomb CG
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Apr; 38(2):383-6. PubMed ID: 4824062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of the duration of auditory and visual stimuli in children and adults.
    Droit-Volet S; Tourret S; Wearden J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Jul; 57(5):797-818. PubMed ID: 15204118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensory modality and time perception in children and adults.
    Droit-Volet S; Meck WH; Penney TB
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 17084041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Closing the mind's eye: deactivation of visual cortex related to auditory task difficulty.
    Hairston WD; Hodges DA; Casanova R; Hayasaka S; Kraft R; Maldjian JA; Burdette JH
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jan; 19(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 18185099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Intersensory facilitation: also concomitant visual stimuli can decrease reaction time].
    Dufft CC; Ulrich R
    Z Exp Psychol; 1999; 46(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 10067137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of music and task difficulty on performance at a visual vigilance task.
    Davies DR; Lang L; Shackleton VJ
    Br J Psychol; 1973 Aug; 64(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 4750266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensory modality, temperament, and the development of sustained attention: a vigilance study in children and adults.
    Curtindale L; Laurie-Rose C; Bennett-Murphy L; Hull S
    Dev Psychol; 2007 May; 43(3):576-89. PubMed ID: 17484572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flexible and abstract resolutions to crossmodal conflicts.
    Donovan CL; Lindsay DS; Kingstone A
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Oct; 56(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 15380869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signal salience and the mindlessness theory of vigilance.
    Helton WS; Warm JS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18499079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Division of attention: evidence for a between-trial component of impaired performance.
    Long J
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1977 Feb; 29(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 860004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.