These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5142390)
1. Evidence of interaction between deprivation effects and stimulus control. Powell RW J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Jul; 16(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 5142390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of stimulus control and deprivation upon discriminative responding. Powell RW J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Mar; 19(2):351-60. PubMed ID: 4706239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Some effects of response-independent reinforcement on auditory generalization gradients. Huff RC; Sherman JE; Cohn M J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jan; 23(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 1117248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the form of stimulus generalization curves for visual intensity. Ernst AJ; Engberg L; Thomas DR J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Sep; 16(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 5121854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variability of responding on a concurrent schedule as a function of body weight. McSweeney FK J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Mar; 21(2):357-9. PubMed ID: 4815398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency of reinforcement as a determinant of extinction-induced aggression during errorless discrimination learning. Rilling M; Caplan HJ J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jan; 23(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 1167899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the development of stimulus control. Heinemann EG; Avin E J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Sep; 20(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 4752088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antecedent reinforcement contingencies in the stimulus control of an auditory discrimination. Pierrel R; Blue S J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Nov; 10(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 6080833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock. Reed P; Yoshino T Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rate-dependent effects of drugs: modification by discriminative stimuli of the effects of amobarbital on schedule-controlled behavior. McKearney JW J Exp Anal Behav; 1970 Sep; 14(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 5491004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extinction reveals stimulus control: latent learning of feature-negative discriminations in pigeons. Hearst E J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1987 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 3819651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stimulus control of behavioral history. Freeman TJ; Lattal KA J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Jan; 57(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 1548448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of deprivation level on the magnitude of positive induction in discriminative straight-alley performance. Hovancik JR; Gruning R; Intorre A Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 6721007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positive contrast in the rat: a test of the additivity theory. Nallan GB; McCoy DF Am J Psychol; 1979 Sep; 92(3):449-61. PubMed ID: 517676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Response-cost punishment via token loss with pigeons. Pietras CJ; Hackenberg TD Behav Processes; 2005 Jun; 69(3):343-56. PubMed ID: 15896532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Separating the reinforcing and discriminative properties of brief-stimulus presentations in second-order schedules. Cohen SL; Calisto G; Lentz BE J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Sep; 32(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 501268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Effects of change-over-delay in the signal-key procedure]. Manabe K; Kawashima T Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1982 Dec; 53(5):304-7. PubMed ID: 7169710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]