These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5142582)
1. Tachistoscopic hemifield effects with hemifield report. Coltheart M; Arthur B Am J Psychol; 1971 Sep; 84(3):355-64. PubMed ID: 5142582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Developmental differences in the field of view during tachistoscopic presentation. Miller LK Child Dev; 1971 Nov; 42(5):1543-51. PubMed ID: 5156651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Does cerebral dominance offer a sufficient explanation for laterality differences in tachistoscopic recognition? White MJ Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Apr; 36(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 4690737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Extraneous lateral stimulation and distribution of errors within tachistoscopic patterns. Nice DS Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Jun; 36(3):1234. PubMed ID: 4711975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Contour effects and pattern preferences in infants: a reply to Greenberg and O'Donnell (1972). Karmel BZ Child Dev; 1974 Mar; 45(1):196-9. PubMed ID: 4820274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A further test of the scanning hypothesis in tachistoscopic recognition. Scheerer E Can J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 27(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 4696075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of "blind" distractors on eye movement trajectories in visual hemifield defects. Van der Stigchel S; van Zoest W; Theeuwes J; Barton JJ J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2025-36. PubMed ID: 18416675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Developmental differences in the field of view during covert and overt search. Miller LK Child Dev; 1973 Jun; 44(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 4705552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reporting of fragmentations in the binocular rivalry of contours. Cogan R; Goldstein AG Am J Psychol; 1972 Dec; 85(4):569-84. PubMed ID: 4660706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual hemifield differences in the perception of letters and contour orientation. White MJ Can J Psychol; 1971 Jun; 25(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 5088846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]