These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5142582)

  • 1. Tachistoscopic hemifield effects with hemifield report.
    Coltheart M; Arthur B
    Am J Psychol; 1971 Sep; 84(3):355-64. PubMed ID: 5142582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developmental differences in the field of view during tachistoscopic presentation.
    Miller LK
    Child Dev; 1971 Nov; 42(5):1543-51. PubMed ID: 5156651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does cerebral dominance offer a sufficient explanation for laterality differences in tachistoscopic recognition?
    White MJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Apr; 36(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 4690737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extraneous lateral stimulation and distribution of errors within tachistoscopic patterns.
    Nice DS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Jun; 36(3):1234. PubMed ID: 4711975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contour effects and pattern preferences in infants: a reply to Greenberg and O'Donnell (1972).
    Karmel BZ
    Child Dev; 1974 Mar; 45(1):196-9. PubMed ID: 4820274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A further test of the scanning hypothesis in tachistoscopic recognition.
    Scheerer E
    Can J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 27(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 4696075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of "blind" distractors on eye movement trajectories in visual hemifield defects.
    Van der Stigchel S; van Zoest W; Theeuwes J; Barton JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2025-36. PubMed ID: 18416675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developmental differences in the field of view during covert and overt search.
    Miller LK
    Child Dev; 1973 Jun; 44(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 4705552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reporting of fragmentations in the binocular rivalry of contours.
    Cogan R; Goldstein AG
    Am J Psychol; 1972 Dec; 85(4):569-84. PubMed ID: 4660706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview.
    Johnson RL; Perea M; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):209-29. PubMed ID: 17311489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual hemifield differences in the perception of letters and contour orientation.
    White MJ
    Can J Psychol; 1971 Jun; 25(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 5088846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial orientation of six-month-old infants.
    Rieser JJ
    Child Dev; 1979 Dec; 50(4):1078-87. PubMed ID: 535431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential phenomenal effects of involuntary eye movements.
    Mefferd RB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1968 Oct; 27(2):623-6. PubMed ID: 5701434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eye movements and visual shape perception.
    Bozkov V; Bohdanecký Z; Radil-Weiss T
    Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1973 Mar; 15(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 4698105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual-motor transformations account for three-dimensional eye position.
    Klier EM; Henriques DY; Crawford JD
    Arch Ital Biol; 2002 Jul; 140(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 12173522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tachistoscopic word recognition performance under conditions of simultaneous bilateral presentation.
    Mackavey W; Curcio F; Rosen J
    Neuropsychologia; 1975 Jan; 13(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 1109458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of cues to illumination on apparent lightness.
    Coren S; Komoda MK
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Jun; 86(2):345-9. PubMed ID: 4775381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neuroscience. Watching single cells pay attention.
    Wolfe JM
    Science; 2005 Apr; 308(5721):503-4. PubMed ID: 15845839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Similarity grouping and peripheral discriminability under uncertainty.
    Beck J
    Am J Psychol; 1972 Mar; 85(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 5019427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.