These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 514360)

  • 1. UK genetic engineering regulations relax gradually.
    Redfearn J
    Nature; 1979 Dec 20-27; 282(5741):769. PubMed ID: 514360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bacteriologists lobby GMAG's first public meeting.
    Lawrence E
    Nature; 1979 Jan; 277(5691):3. PubMed ID: 552596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. UK revamps genetic engineering panel to focus on policy.
    Nature; 1996 Sep; 383(6596):114. PubMed ID: 11644801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Still looser UK guidelines.
    Nature; 1980 Sep; 287(5780):265-6. PubMed ID: 6932590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Britain's genetic manipulation regulations to be extended.
    Newmark P
    Nature; 1987 Oct 1-7; 329(6138):379. PubMed ID: 3477700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Keeping the gene genie in the bottle.
    Yanchinski S
    New Sci; 1983 Apr; 98(1353):69-71. PubMed ID: 11655531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Social implications of experiments in genetic manipulation.
    Wolstenholme G
    J R Soc Arts; 1979 Sep; 127(5278):643-53. PubMed ID: 11662763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DNA guidelines for further attenuation.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1981 Mar; 290(5804):281. PubMed ID: 7207619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. OSHA looks at occupational regulations for recombinant DNA use.
    Nature; 1980 Feb; 283(5747):512. PubMed ID: 6986560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic manipulation advisory group (GMAG) and the environment for genetic engineering in Britain.
    Williamson R
    Biochem Soc Symp; 1979; 44():119-21. PubMed ID: 291433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Will the DNA guidelines wither away?
    Nature; 1980 Oct; 287(5782):473-4. PubMed ID: 6999363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic engineering. Dispute over monitoring.
    Webb B
    Nature; 1989 Sep; 341(6237):7. PubMed ID: 2770882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cloning committees.
    Barnaby W
    Nature; 1980 Oct; 287(5783):574. PubMed ID: 7432475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A shepherd for transgenic animals.
    Connor S
    New Sci; 1989 Jan; 121(1648):25. PubMed ID: 11655927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Common sense in genetic engineering.
    Harris R
    Ethics Sci Med; 1978; 5(2-4):57-64. PubMed ID: 11662705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dutch get tough.
    Becker J
    Nature; 1981 Apr; 290(5806):436. PubMed ID: 7219532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gene manipulation in Britain.
    Ager BP
    Nature; 1987 Jan 15-21; 325(6101):190. PubMed ID: 3808013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NIH director unlikely to grant exemption from controls for DNA experiments.
    Nature; 1979 Nov; 282(5734):3. PubMed ID: 503186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DNA recombination forces resignation.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1980 Sep; 287(5779):179-80. PubMed ID: 7432453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DNA guidelines. More relaxation.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1980 Oct; 287(5781):380-1. PubMed ID: 6933313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.