These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5144398)

  • 1. [Comparative measurement of the dampening effect of antiphones on patients and on the temporal bone preparation].
    Cancura W; Scheiblechner H; Schwetz F
    Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1971; 105(12):543-57. PubMed ID: 5144398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audiometer modification and pulse-tone technique for pure-tone threshold determination.
    Bragg VC; Collins FG
    Aerosp Med; 1969 Jan; 40(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 5782663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Objective auditory threshold determination using respiratory sound as indicator].
    Kumpf W
    HNO; 1968 Feb; 16(2):52-3. PubMed ID: 5723073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The bone-anchored hearing aid: principal design and audiometric results.
    Håkansson BE; Carlsson PU; Tjellström A; Lidén G
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Sep; 73(9):670-5. PubMed ID: 7988397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
    Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Practicum in audiometry. II. Threshold audiometry: audiometer, hearing examination rooms, technic of auditory threshold determination].
    Niemeyer W
    HNO; 1970 Feb; 18(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 5444189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Expediency of applying speech audiometry by bone conductivity for the diagnosis of the status of the receptor apparatus of the cochlea].
    Dunaĭvitser BI
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1969; 29(4):7-12. PubMed ID: 5387132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of bone oscillator coupling method, placement location, and occlusion on bone-conduction auditory steady-state responses in infants.
    Small SA; Hatton JL; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 17204901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pure-tone air conduction audiogram.
    Bragg VC
    Aerosp Med; 1970 Mar; 41(3):264-8. PubMed ID: 5417366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re: Noise levels generated within the external auditory canal during microsuction aural toilet and the effect on hearing: a prospective controlled series.
    Baguley DM; Knight RD
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2009 Jun; 34(3):261; author reply 262. PubMed ID: 19531188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SISI test in pre-operative mixed-loss patients.
    Pratt LL; Egan JJ
    Laryngoscope; 1968 Nov; 78(11):1965-70. PubMed ID: 5725324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparative audiometric study of bone conduction and chondral conduction. Its importance in the diagnosis of endo- and retro-cochlear perception deafness].
    Pialoux P; Fontelle P; Chouard CH; Freyss G
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1974 Mar; 91(3):89-97. PubMed ID: 4848331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Differential threshold of sound intensity and bone conduction in otosclerotic patients].
    Dunaĭvitser BI
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1969; 29(3):100-1. PubMed ID: 5360192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Reaction time to a pure sound partially masked contralaterally by 2 other simultaneous pure sounds chosen on either side of the 1st one].
    Chocholle R; Da Costa L
    C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1971; 165(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 4257749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of sound.
    Randolph KJ
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1978 Oct; 11(3):597-610. PubMed ID: 733248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Residual effect of a stimulus with complex spectrum (white noise) on the auditory threshold of several fundamental frequencies].
    Pirodda E; Cenacchi V; Segatta D
    Otorinolaringol Ital; 1968; 37(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 5719450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technical state of audiometers in hearing conservation programmes - Can we determine hearing threshold correctly?
    Pfeiffer BH
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):283-91. PubMed ID: 6939099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Frequency discrimination].
    Giaccai F
    JFORL J Fr Otorhinolaryngol Audiophonol Chir Maxillofac; 1972 Mar; 21(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 4261695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Influence of masking noise on the threshold of bone conduction].
    Rakhmilevich AG
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1971; 33(3):26-30. PubMed ID: 5097344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peek-a-boo audiometry; a hearing test in infants.
    van den Horst AP; Kuyper P
    Pract Otorhinolaryngol (Basel); 1969; 31(5):288-95. PubMed ID: 5373062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.