These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5147012)
21. [Conditions for the comparability of biochemical and histological data in fluoroscopy]. Zanotti L Mikroskopie; 1968 Aug; 23(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 5687132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Comparison of advantages and disadvantages of fluorography and fluoroscopy. Study of an ophthalmoscopic filter suitable for this technic]. Bonnin P Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1967; 67(5):444-51. PubMed ID: 5598060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Stereo-ophthalmoscope model 110 of VEB Carl Zeiss Jena adapted for stereophotography]. Marcinkiewicz W Klin Oczna; 1984 Nov; 86(11):500-3. PubMed ID: 6535887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Cervical spine imaging using standard C-arm fluoroscopy: patient and surgeon exposure to ionizing radiation. Giordano BD; Baumhauer JF; Morgan TL; Rechtine GR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(18):1970-6. PubMed ID: 18665022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Digital fundus image grading with the non-mydriatic Visucam(PRO NM) versus the FF450(plus) camera in diabetic retinopathy. Neubauer AS; Rothschuh A; Ulbig MW; Blum M Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 17944975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of digital cameras: features essential for the orthopaedic surgeon. Andres BM; Khanna AJ; Wenz JF; Faust AF; Frassica FJ Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Apr; (421):10-6. PubMed ID: 15123919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The use of automatic cameras in small biomedical object photography. Beau LJ J Biol Photogr; 1995 Jan; 63(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 7890586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Notes on the use of cameras by field units in cancer investigations. KOECK GP J Biol Photogr Assoc; 1957; 25(1-2):45-6. PubMed ID: 13513637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Gamma cameras--advantages and disadvantages. Webster EW Lahey Clin Found Bull; 1968; 17(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 5636903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Regarding digital cameras. Budris K Dermatol Surg; 2001 Sep; 27(9):848-9. PubMed ID: 11553178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Structure from motion with wide circular field of view cameras. Micusík B; Pajdla T IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2006 Jul; 28(7):1135-49. PubMed ID: 16792102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. CRT cameras. Choosing a camera for an oscilloscope or CRT. Jenner R Med Electron; 1986 Feb; 17(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 10275624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Serial angiofluorography in the operation theater]. Maurer HJ Rontgenblatter; 1981 Mar; 34(3):100-2. PubMed ID: 7209306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intraoral cameras for everyone. Levin RP Dent Econ; 1993 Nov; 83(11):21. PubMed ID: 8150146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Cameras for digital microscopy. Spring KR Methods Cell Biol; 2007; 81():171-86. PubMed ID: 17519168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Practical aspects of adjusting digital cameras. Nordberg JJ; Sluder G Methods Cell Biol; 2007; 81():159-69. PubMed ID: 17519167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Digital cameras: a practical solution for radiologists (review)]. Oztürk A; Oztürk E Tani Girisim Radyol; 2003 Dec; 9(4):401-6. PubMed ID: 14730946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. More versatile digital cameras: a useful tool for those in health promotion and education. Fodor JT Promot Educ; 2004; 11(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 15208917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]