These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 514764)

  • 41. Sex-related differences in hemispheric asymmetries in processing simple geomerical figures.
    Bagnara S; Roncato S; Simion F; Umilta C
    Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Aug; 51(1):223-9. PubMed ID: 7432960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Can alphabet recall be part of a visuo-spatial task?
    Hughes M; Wilson-Derose M; Kiely B
    Br J Psychol; 1980 Nov; 71(Pt 4):557-60. PubMed ID: 7437676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Processing persuasive arguments: recall and recognition as a function of agreement and manipulated activation asymmetry.
    Drake RA
    Brain Cogn; 1991 Jan; 15(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 2009175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Reply to Greenberg's critique of Malik, et al.'s experiment on the method of subliminal psychodynamic activation.
    Malik R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Aug; 87(1):313-4. PubMed ID: 9760663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Experimenter bias and subliminal perception.
    Barber PJ; Rushton JP
    Br J Psychol; 1975 Aug; 66(3):357-72. PubMed ID: 1182403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Hemispheric asymmetries for physical and semantic selection of visually presented words.
    Martin M
    Neuropsychologia; 1978; 16(6):717-24. PubMed ID: 748808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Experimenter bias against subliminal perception? Comments on a replication.
    Spence DP; Smith GJ
    Br J Psychol; 1977 Aug; 68(3):279-80. PubMed ID: 890214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reexamination of effect of a subliminal verbal food stimulus on subjective hunger ratings.
    George SG; Jennings LB
    Psychol Rep; 1972 Apr; 30(2):521-2. PubMed ID: 5024930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A study of alpha hemispheric asymmetries for verbal and nonverbal stimuli in males and females.
    Moore WH; Haynes WO
    Brain Lang; 1980 Mar; 9(2):338-49. PubMed ID: 7363077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Hemispheric factors and scanning dynamics in the processing of briefly exposed stimuli by human subjects: bibliography.
    Fudin R; Masterson CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Aug; 41(1):299-310. PubMed ID: 1101190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Can self-reported encoding strategy and recognition skill be diagnostic of performance in eyewitness identifications?
    Olsson N; Juslin P
    J Appl Psychol; 1999 Feb; 84(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 10089816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Hemisphericity, cognitive set, and susceptibility to subliminal perception.
    Sackeim HA; Packer IK; Gur RC
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1977 Dec; 86(6):624-30. PubMed ID: 599213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Subliminal psychodynamic activation: updated comprehensive list of experimental results and comments on previous lists.
    Fudin R; Benjamin C
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 1):959-77. PubMed ID: 1608734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The effect of embedded words in a brief visual display.
    Somekh DE
    Br J Psychol; 1976 Nov; 67(4):529-35. PubMed ID: 1009284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Changing the perception of behavioral properties by subliminal presentation.
    Overbeeke CJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Feb; 62(1):255-8. PubMed ID: 3960668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Application of signal detection theory to subliminal and supraliminal accessory stimulation.
    Zwosta MF; Zenhausern R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1969 Jun; 28(3):699-704. PubMed ID: 5808957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. EFFECT OF SUBLIMINAL STRUCTURAL CUES ON REPRODUCTIONS OF A SIMPLE LINE DRAWING.
    WORTHINGTON AG
    Percept Mot Skills; 1964 Dec; 19():823-6. PubMed ID: 14238225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Experimenter bias against subliminal perception? A rejoinder.
    Barber PJ
    Br J Psychol; 1977 Aug; 68(3):281-2. PubMed ID: 890215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cerebral localization and the psi syndrome.
    Ehrenwald J
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 1975 Dec; 161(6):393-8. PubMed ID: 1194909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. On testing specific hypotheses about subliminal perception: a reply to Shevrin.
    Schwartz M
    Psychophysiology; 1976 Jan; 13(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 1244626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.