These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5148539)

  • 1. [Screening for cervical cancer in current gynecological practice. Conclusions].
    Malinas Y
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1971; 66(11):651-2. PubMed ID: 5148539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Cervical cancer and mass screening].
    Hakama M
    Duodecim; 1970; 86(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 5421372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The role of the medical corps in a mass screening program for cervical cancer. The program "Female Health Action in 3 urban districts of Lyons].
    Mignotte H; Perol D; Fontanière B; Nachury LP; Lasset C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1998 Sep; 27(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 9791576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Incidence of cervical cancer 5 years after mass screening in the community of Medvesćak].
    Juras N; Tućan V; Pirkić A; Sućur A
    Acta Med Iugosl; 1984; 38(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 6496168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Systematic screening for cancer of the uterine cervix (epidemiologic aspects)].
    Campion J; Flamant R
    Bull Inst Natl Sante Rech Med; 1966; 21(5):977-94. PubMed ID: 5976404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cytology and colposcopy in mass screening for cervical cancer.
    Grönroos M; Hautera P; Järvi O; Kangas S; Rauramo L
    Acta Cytol; 1967; 11(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 5230438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Cervical cancer screening for high risk women: is it possible? Results of a cervical cancer screening program in three suburban districts of Lyon].
    Mignotte H; Perol D; Fontanière B; Nachury LP; Blanc-Jouvand A; Fouillat V; Chauvin F; Lasset C
    Bull Cancer; 1999 Jun; 86(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 10417430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Analysis of the result of mass screening for cervix cancer in a Tientsin district].
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1973; 9():519-20. PubMed ID: 4200755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Differences in cervical cancer mass screening results in Greater-Helsinki area].
    Nieminen P; Tarkkanen J; Timonen T; Meyer B; Hakama M; Anttila A
    Duodecim; 2000; 116(22):2489-96. PubMed ID: 12053343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Creating favorable conditions for organized screening of cervical cancer].
    Baudier F
    Sante Publique; 2000 May; 12 Spec No():5-10. PubMed ID: 10989624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Can we and must we organize cervical cancer screening in France? Results of the pilot project "EVE" in the department of Bas-Rhin].
    Fender M; Schaffer P; Dellenbach P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1998 Nov; 27(7):683-91. PubMed ID: 9921438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Recommendations from the experimental sites for implementing organized cervical cancer screening in France].
    Baudier F; Schapman S; Giordanella JP
    Sante Publique; 2000 May; 12 Spec No():71-88. PubMed ID: 10989630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical cancer in Kentucky.
    Friedell GH; Ross FE; Tucker TC; Cook CC; Doering DL; Hilgers R; Milburn CS; Pursell SH; Spires SE; Hinton M; Sorrell C; Edwards MJ
    J Ky Med Assoc; 2000 Sep; 98(9):398-405. PubMed ID: 11022405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Participation in cervical cancer screening in Germany.
    Klug SJ; Taylor KJ; Scheidemann-Wesp U; Lautz D; Güther B; Potthoff P; Blettner M
    Prev Med; 2010 Nov; 51(5):431-2. PubMed ID: 20736032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Results of the epidemiologic survey for the detection of cervical cancer in women of Lakavec and surroundings].
    Petrović M; Krajinović S; Udicki S; Petrović L; Radovanović Z; Vlajinac H; Ducić S
    Nar Zdrav; 1971 Sep; 27(9):332-5. PubMed ID: 5155792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Population screening for cervical carcinoma in Ostergötland.
    Sjöstedt S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1969; 48():Suppl 3:62. PubMed ID: 5380827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cytological history of cases of invasive cervical cancer diagnosed in France in 2006].
    Boulanger JC; Fauvet R; Urrutiaguer S; Drean Y; Sevestre H; Ganry O; Bergeron C; Gondry J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Sep; 35(9):764-71. PubMed ID: 17765001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Carcinoma of the uterine cervix and mass screening].
    Timonen S; Nieminen U
    Duodecim; 1970; 86(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 5421373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process.
    Leyden WA; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Mouchawar J; Bischoff K; Yood MU; Gilbert J; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(9):675-83. PubMed ID: 15870438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Can we be satisfied with the results of uterine cervix cancer control in the city of Zagreb?].
    Stoiljković C; Ribarić M
    Lijec Vjesn; 1974 Aug; 96(8):459-62. PubMed ID: 4461895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.