These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5148990)
1. [Evaluation of 5 years of electroencephalographic audiometry]. Morgon A; Charachon D; Gerin P Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1971 Nov; 92():Suppl:765-72. PubMed ID: 5148990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Present day scope and limitations of evoked response audiometry. Beagley HA Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1971 Nov; 92():Suppl:753-63. PubMed ID: 5148989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Audioelectroencephalography. Its practical value in determination of auditory function]. Cincă D; Broşteanu E; Tacorian D Otorinolaringologie; 1970; 15(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 5486063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical application of evoked-response audiometry. van der Sandt W S Afr Med J; 1969 Jan; 43(2):33-5. PubMed ID: 5776804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Complementarity of audiometry with evoked EEG potentials and impedance measurements in deaf children]. Demanez JP; Lhonneux-Ledoux F Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1974; 28(4-5):409-17. PubMed ID: 4440471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evoked response audiometry in compared groups of normally hearing adults, normally hearing and deaf children and multiple-handicapped children. Sharrard GA Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1971 Apr; 30(4):366-7. PubMed ID: 4103547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. First international symposium of the ERA-club. Freiburg, April 1st-4th 1970. Opening. Is ERA ready for routine clinical use? Zöllner F; Davis H Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1971; 198(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 5573662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Influence of the intensity of stimulation on evoked auditory potentials in normal subjects and in hypoacusia with recruitment]. Marco J; Ruíz Carmona E Acta Otorinolaryngol Iber Am; 1972; 23(2):181-8 passim. PubMed ID: 5077020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving evoked response audiometry with special reference to the use of machine scoring. Schimmel H; Rapin I; Cohen MM Audiology; 1974; 13(1):33-65. PubMed ID: 4809684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnosis of hearing loss in infants using auditory evoked responses. Rapin I; Ruben RJ; Lyttle M Laryngoscope; 1970 May; 80(5):712-22. PubMed ID: 5452510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional dysacusis: the utilization of EEG activity in the determination of hearing threshold level, a case report. Hay I J S Afr Speech Hear Assoc; 1973 Dec; 20(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 4780838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrocochleography or evoked cortical responses: which is preferable in diagnosis of hearing loss. Sohmer H; Pratt H; Feinmesser M Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1974; 95(7-8):515-22. PubMed ID: 4460144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Various audiometry tests designated as objective]. Freyss G; Legent F Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1969 Mar; 86(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 5769827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]