These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Comparison between conventional audiometry and ERA of deaf children in a serial test. Claus H; Ott A; Handrock M; von Arentsschild O Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1975; 96(3-4):133-7. PubMed ID: 1215702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical experience with an early AER of 5- 10 ms latency. Rudolph N; Mrowinski D; Giesen M Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1974; 95(7-8):566-70. PubMed ID: 4460153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Five years of experience with electric response audiometry. Russ FM; Simmons FB J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Jun; 17(2):184-93. PubMed ID: 4836039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Diagnosis of the internal ear hearing disorders with evoked brain potentials (ERA)]. Kollár A Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1971; 105(3):101-6. PubMed ID: 5124603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Validation of clinical ERA at Central Institute for the Deaf. Davis H; Hirsh SK; Shelnutt J; Dinges DF Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1974; 95(7-8):475-80. PubMed ID: 4477667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The value of ERA in recruitment determination. Handrock M; Claus H Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1975; 96(3-4):139-45. PubMed ID: 1215703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The relation between functional parameters of subjective and objective audiometry. Stange G Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1971; 198(1):85-101. PubMed ID: 5573665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Audiometric examination of non-cooperative subjects]. Sirjiţă N Otorinolaringologie; 1970; 15(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 5486061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of the newer tests of auditory function. Cody DT; Griffing T; Taylor WF Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1968 Aug; 77(4):686-705. PubMed ID: 4875387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Evoked potentials and their value in the diagnosis of deafness of infants and young children]. Poncet P; Fournier G; Loth D Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1972 Jun; 89(6):365-8. PubMed ID: 5078887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Cortical audiometry: an objective method of evaluating auditory acuity in awake and sleeping man. Cody DT; Klass DW; Bickford RG Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1967; 71(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 6050313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Further clinical experiences with electric-response audiometry (Audio-EEG) in children with hearing disorders]. Biesalski P; Leitner H Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1971; 199(2):551-2. PubMed ID: 5153166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Evoked response audiometry in 241 normal and hearing impaired children under three years. Barnet AB Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1971; 198(1):154-7. PubMed ID: 5573660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Audiometry in children]. van Strijthem YM Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1972; 26():Suppl 2:3-132. PubMed ID: 4580508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Audiometry of averaged evoked responses in the diagnosis of non-organic deafness]. Bochenek Z; Bochenek W Otolaryngol Pol; 1971; 25(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 5093480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Value and limit of clinical application of early auditory potentials in pediatrics and neurology]. Despland PA Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1981 Mar; 101(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 6266004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]