These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5149299)
21. Interhemispheric transfer as a function of light intensity discrimination difficulty. Hall TL; Thompson RW J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1971 Oct; 77(1):166-70. PubMed ID: 5120682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Experimental evidence for a brain-stem contribution to visual perception in man. Trevarthen C Brain Behav Evol; 1970; 3(1):338-52. PubMed ID: 5522352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Interhemispheric transfer and integration of imagined visual stimuli. Savazzi S; Mancini F; Marzi CA Neuropsychologia; 2008 Feb; 46(3):803-9. PubMed ID: 17920086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Visual half-field experiments are a good measure of cerebral language dominance if used properly: evidence from fMRI. Hunter ZR; Brysbaert M Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(1):316-25. PubMed ID: 17716695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Superiority of right visual half-fields in right-handers for recall of digits presented at varying rates. Hines D; Satz P Neuropsychologia; 1971 Mar; 9(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 5146482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Interhemispheric differences in the spatial-frequency description of images and the consequences for visual recognition]. Nevskaia AA; Leushina LI Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1990; 40(5):915-24. PubMed ID: 1964337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Tachistoscopic recognition of line orientation. Sasanuma S; Kobayashi Y Neuropsychologia; 1978; 16(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 692850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Visual asymmetry in perception of faces. Gilbert C; Bakan P Neuropsychologia; 1973 Jul; 11(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 4792186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The nonspeech assessment of hemispheric specialization in retarded children. Smith ST; Cash C; Barr SE; Putney RT Neuropsychologia; 1986; 24(2):293-6. PubMed ID: 3714036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Interhemispheric effects on choice reaction times to one-, two-, and three-letter displays. Umiltá C; Frost N; Hyman R J Exp Psychol; 1972 Apr; 93(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 5013334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Split fovea theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in reading: a review of the evidence. Ellis AW; Brysbaert M Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19720073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Imageability does not interact with visual field in lateral word recognition with oral report. Lambert AJ; Beaumont JG Brain Lang; 1983 Sep; 20(1):115-42. PubMed ID: 6626938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Choice reaction-time study assessing the verbal behavior of the minor hemisphere in normal adult humans. Moscovitch M J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1972 Jul; 80(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 5044264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Cerebral hemispheric dominance and simultaneous perception of verbal and non-verbal stimuli]. Perret E; Simeon G; Hugenschmidt W Schweiz Arch Neurol Neurochir Psychiatr; 1970; 107(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 5516735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Recognition of visual images by separate hemispheres in conditions of masked blocking of interhemispheric transmission]. Glezer VD; Nevskaia AA; Chernova ND; Gauzel'man VE Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2003 Oct; 89(10):1177-83. PubMed ID: 14758642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reversal behavior in split-brain monkeys. Johnson JD; Gazzaniga MS Physiol Behav; 1971 Jun; 6(6):707-9. PubMed ID: 5004623 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Laterality differences in tachistoscopic word recognition in normal and delayed readers in elementary school. Olson ME Neuropsychologia; 1973 Jul; 11(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 4792185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]