These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5154836)
61. [Margin sealing and other details on dental restorations, with special attention to the peridontium]. Nyström PE Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1969 Feb; 79(2):65-86. PubMed ID: 5260994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration. Lee MR; Cho BH; Son HH; Um CM; Lee IB Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 16530819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. [A new method in the use of TMS pins for obtaining adequate retention of class V gold inlays]. Gkobedaros KX Odontiatriki; 1973; ():188-91. PubMed ID: 4524147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. The number and location of threaded pins for optimal resistance and retention in premolar amalgam restorations. Harrington WG; Moon PC; Crockett WD Va Dent J; 1982 Oct; 59(5):24-31. PubMed ID: 6964007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. A paralleling instrument for the guidance of pin channels and high-speed preparations. Karlström G J Prosthet Dent; 1971 Jul; 26(1):41-55. PubMed ID: 4932135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. [Positional relationship between class-5 cavity prepared for inlay purposes and the pulp chamber of the upper permanent central incisor]. Fukano M; Yoshii A; Ishiyama T; Takahashi K; Ishikawa T Shikwa Gakuho; 1969 Oct; 69(10):1352-9. PubMed ID: 5260579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. The effect of resin composite pins on the retention of class IV restorations. Muhlbauer JA; Dunn WJ; Roberts HW; Murchison DF Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 12022461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Amalgam restoration of posterior teeth before endodontic treatment. Barkmeier WW; Murrin JR; Anderson RW J Endod; 1980 Feb; 6(2):446-9. PubMed ID: 6935345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. [Support of large fillings by the use of endodontic pins]. Kalogiannides T Stoma (Thessaloniki); 1969; 1(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 5264658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. [Do composite inlays by the indirect method constitute a solution for the future?]. Loufrani G; Noel JM; Weiler B Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1984; 13(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 6597510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. [Onlay: restoration and remodeling of the masticatory surface]. Calderari G; Hoffer E Rass Int Stomatol Prat; 1967; 18(5):329-43. PubMed ID: 4864281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Amalgam retention using pins, boxes, and Amalgambond. Fischer GM; Stewart GP; Panelli J Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):173-5. PubMed ID: 7803002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. The use of resin composite pins to improve retention of Class IV resin composite restorations. Roberts HW; Hermesch CB; Charlton DG Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 11203830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Complications of pin placement. A survey of 429 cases. Newsome PR; Youngson CC Br Dent J; 1987 Dec; 163(12):375-8. PubMed ID: 3480731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]