These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 515699)

  • 1. Perceived sound quality of hearing aids.
    Gabrielsson A; Sjögren H
    Scand Audiol; 1979; 8(3):159-69. PubMed ID: 515699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceived sound quality of sound-reproducing systems.
    Gabrielsson A; Sjögren H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Apr; 65(4):1019-33. PubMed ID: 447915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
    Narendran MM; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of sound quality judgments for monaural and binaural hearing aid processed stimuli.
    Balfour PB; Hawkins DB
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):331-9. PubMed ID: 1487093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Questionnaires on desirable properties of hearing aids.
    Hagerman B; Gabrielsson A
    Scand Audiol; 1985; 14(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 4023600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceived sound quality in a hearing aid with vented and closed earmould equalized in frequency response.
    Lundberg G; Ovegård A; Hagerman B; Gabrielsson A; Brändström U
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 1641577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceived sound quality of reproductions with different frequency responses and sound levels.
    Gabrielsson A; Hagerman B; Bech-Kristensen T; Lundberg G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1359-66. PubMed ID: 2229671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two hearing aid receiver-amplifier combinations using sound quality judgments.
    Palmer CV; Killion MC; Wilber LA; Ballad WJ
    Ear Hear; 1995 Dec; 16(6):587-98. PubMed ID: 8747808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient-centred audiological rehabilitation: perspectives of older adults who own hearing aids.
    Grenness C; Hickson L; Laplante-Lévesque A; Davidson B
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S68-75. PubMed ID: 24528290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multidimensional scaling of quality judgments of speech signals processed by hearing aids.
    Punch JL; Montgomery AA; Schwartz DM; Walden BE; Prosek RA; Howard MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Aug; 68(2):458-66. PubMed ID: 7419804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of individual hearing aids utilizing microphone and induction coil input.
    Sung RJ; Hodgson WR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 5558092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
    Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of some perceptual dimensions underlying loudspeaker dissimilarities.
    Lavandier M; Meunier S; Herzog P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4186-98. PubMed ID: 18537370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds - perception by normal hearing subjects.
    Skagerstrand Å; Köbler S; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):775-783. PubMed ID: 28485649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A test suite for hearing aid evaluation.
    Kates JM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1990; 27(3):255-78. PubMed ID: 2401957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advantages of directional hearing aid microphones related to room acoustics.
    Leeuw AR; Dreschler WA
    Audiology; 1991; 30(6):330-44. PubMed ID: 1772383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wind noise in hearing aids with directional and omnidirectional microphones: Polar characteristics of custom-made hearing aids.
    Chung K; McKibben N; Mongeau L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2529-42. PubMed ID: 20370035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of Multi-microphone Signal Enhancement Algorithms on the Acoustics and Detectability of Angular and Radial Source Movements.
    Lundbeck M; Hartog L; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Bramsløw L; Neher T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518779719. PubMed ID: 29900799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Localization of virtual sound sources with bilateral hearing aids in realistic acoustical scenes.
    Mueller MF; Kegel A; Schimmel SM; Dillier N; Hofbauer M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4732-42. PubMed ID: 22712946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and psychometric properties of the sound preference and hearing habits questionnaire (SP-HHQ).
    Meis M; Huber R; Fischer RL; Schulte M; Spilski J; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S118-S129. PubMed ID: 27875658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.