These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 515699)

  • 41. Objective and perceptual comparisons of two bluetooth hearing aid assistive devices.
    Clark JL; Pustejovsky C; Vanneste S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Aug; 12(6):614-617. PubMed ID: 27377435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Hearing loss, speech, and hearing aids.
    Van Tasell DJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 36(2):228-44. PubMed ID: 8487516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Variations in the feedback of hearing aids.
    Hellgren J; Lunner T; Arlinger S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2821-33. PubMed ID: 10573898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Hearing aids with distorsion].
    Lafon JC; Gharbi T
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1989; 43(5):467-74. PubMed ID: 2638130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Methods for the evaluation of hearing aids.
    Levitt H
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):199-240. PubMed ID: 292143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparison of hearing aids with amplitude compression.
    Nábĕlek IV; Robinette LN
    Audiology; 1977; 16(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 836256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Open Versus Closed Hearing-Aid Fittings: A Literature Review of Both Fitting Approaches.
    Winkler A; Latzel M; Holube I
    Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26879562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Acoustical and Perceptual Comparison of Noise Reduction and Compression in Hearing Aids.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Aug; 58(4):1363-76. PubMed ID: 26090648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Bimodal stimulation: benefits for music perception and sound quality.
    Sucher CM; McDermott HJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2009; 10 Suppl 1():96-9. PubMed ID: 19230032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Damping the hearing aid frequency response: effects on speech clarity and preferred listening level.
    Cox RM; Gilmore C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Sep; 29(3):357-65. PubMed ID: 3762099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Stability-controlled hybrid adaptive feedback cancellation scheme for hearing aids.
    Nordholm S; Schepker H; Tran LTT; Doclo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):150. PubMed ID: 29390746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Adapting Hearing Devices to the Individual Ear Acoustics: Database and Target Response Correction Functions for Various Device Styles.
    Denk F; Ernst SMA; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518779313. PubMed ID: 29877161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. An Extended Binaural Real-Time Auralization System With an Interface to Research Hearing Aids for Experiments on Subjects With Hearing Loss.
    Pausch F; Aspöck L; Vorländer M; Fels J
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518800871. PubMed ID: 30322347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Complex and pure-tone signals in the evaluation of hearing-aid characteristics.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE; Seewald RC; Hawkins DB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):380-5. PubMed ID: 2359278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Directional loudness and binaural summation for wideband and reverberant sounds.
    Sivonen VP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):2852-61. PubMed ID: 17550184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Factors which affect measures of speech audibility with hearing aids.
    Popelka GR; Mason DI
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5 Suppl):109S-118S. PubMed ID: 3678649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of measurements of the characteristics of directional microphone hearing aids in an IAC test room and an anechoic chamber.
    Brey RH; Caustin EI; McPherson JH
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(5):173-81. PubMed ID: 853009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An individualised acoustically transparent earpiece for hearing devices.
    Denk F; Hiipakka M; Kollmeier B; Ernst SMA
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S62-S70. PubMed ID: 28635506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Judgments of hearing aid processed music.
    Franks JR
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 7060840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.