These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5159066)

  • 1. Differential cerebral dominance to noise and verbal stimuli.
    Cohn R
    Trans Am Neurol Assoc; 1971; 96():127-31. PubMed ID: 5159066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanisms of auditory comprehension. II. Cerebral dominance.
    Albert ML; Goldblum MC; Benson DF; Hécaen H
    Trans Am Neurol Assoc; 1971; 96():132-5. PubMed ID: 5159068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relation of cerebral dominance and handedness to visual evoked potentials.
    Gott PS; Boyarsky LL
    J Neurobiol; 1972; 3(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 5028294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech perception and brain laterality: the effect of ear advantage on auditory event-related potentials.
    Ahonniska J; Cantell M; Tolvanen A; Lyytinen H
    Brain Lang; 1993 Aug; 45(2):127-46. PubMed ID: 8358593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus-dominance effects and lateral asymmetries for language in normal subjects and in patients with a single functional hemisphere.
    Di Stefano M; Marano E; Viti M
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Oct; 56(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 15380876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Interaction of the functions of the cerebral hemispheres].
    Wyke MA
    Arch Neurobiol (Madr); 1983; 46(6):369-76. PubMed ID: 6367687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of acoustic gradient noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials.
    Novitski N; Alho K; Korzyukov O; Carlson S; Martinkauppi S; Escera C; Rinne T; Aronen HJ; Näätänen R
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 1):244-51. PubMed ID: 11525334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evoked potentials to monaural verbal stimuli [proceedings].
    Szirtes J
    Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1977 May; 19(2):167-8. PubMed ID: 888667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interhemispheric relationships with somatic therapy.
    Small IF; Small JG; Milstein V; Sharpley P
    Dis Nerv Syst; 1973 Mar; 34(3):170-7. PubMed ID: 4146032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determinants of dominance: is language laterality explained by physical or linguistic features of speech?
    Shtyrov Y; Pihko E; Pulvermüller F
    Neuroimage; 2005 Aug; 27(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 16023039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential cerebral processing of noise and verbal stimuli.
    Cohen R
    Science; 1971 May; 172(3983):599-601. PubMed ID: 5555085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Degree of handedness and cerebral dominance.
    Isaacs KL; Barr WB; Nelson PK; Devinsky O
    Neurology; 2006 Jun; 66(12):1855-8. PubMed ID: 16801650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of dichotic, monaural and diotic verbal stimuli on auditory evoked potentials.
    Haaland KY
    Neuropsychologia; 1974 Jul; 12(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 4419531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contextual meaning effects on speech-evoked potentials.
    Brown WS; Marsh JT; Smith JC
    Behav Biol; 1973 Dec; 9(6):755-61. PubMed ID: 4764256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early onset of complementary specialization of cerebral hemispheres in man.
    Woods BT; Teuber HL
    Trans Am Neurol Assoc; 1973; 98():113-7. PubMed ID: 4784915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Averaged encephalic response of aphasics to linguistic and nonlinguistic auditory stimuli.
    Greenberg HJ; Metting PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Mar; 17(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 4364036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gamma-band activity dissociates between matching and nonmatching stimulus pairs in an auditory delayed matching-to-sample task.
    Leiberg S; Kaiser J; Lutzenberger W
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 30(4):1357-64. PubMed ID: 16469508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) determined temporal modulation of visual and auditory sensory processing in the context of classical conditioning to faces.
    Dolan RJ; Heinze HJ; Hurlemann R; Hinrichs H
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):778-89. PubMed ID: 16784875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of the contingent negative variation in children.
    Cohen J; Offner F; Palmer CW
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1967 Jul; 23(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 4165567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Internal motor-kinesthetic speech and internal verbal diagrams of an auditory character: apropos of a visual and auditory-verbal hallucinatory aura with a temporal anterior electrographic focus in a right-handed patient].
    Chesni Y
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 1966 Nov; 115(5):966-71. PubMed ID: 5972499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.