These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5159068)
1. Mechanisms of auditory comprehension. II. Cerebral dominance. Albert ML; Goldblum MC; Benson DF; Hécaen H Trans Am Neurol Assoc; 1971; 96():132-5. PubMed ID: 5159068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Differential cerebral dominance to noise and verbal stimuli. Cohn R Trans Am Neurol Assoc; 1971; 96():127-31. PubMed ID: 5159066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Hemispheric cerebral dominance. Benton AL Isr J Med Sci; 1970; 6(2):294-303. PubMed ID: 4918561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [An investigation of monoaural and biaural discrimination ability (author's transl)]. Gutezeit G; Vietor K Z Kinderheilkd; 1974; 117(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 4421407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Determinants of dominance: is language laterality explained by physical or linguistic features of speech? Shtyrov Y; Pihko E; Pulvermüller F Neuroimage; 2005 Aug; 27(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 16023039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional asymmetry of the brain in children aged 6-7 years. Konovalov VF; Burkovetskaya ZI Hum Physiol; 1979; 5(5):569-72. PubMed ID: 551026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech perception and brain laterality: the effect of ear advantage on auditory event-related potentials. Ahonniska J; Cantell M; Tolvanen A; Lyytinen H Brain Lang; 1993 Aug; 45(2):127-46. PubMed ID: 8358593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Categorical perception in a non-linguistic mode. Locke S; Kellar L Cortex; 1973 Dec; 9(4):355-69. PubMed ID: 4784693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetoencephalographic studies of language reorganization after cerebral insult. Breier JI; Billingsley-Marshall R; Pataraia E; Castillo EM; Papanicolaou AC Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 87(12 Suppl 2):S77-83. PubMed ID: 17140883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tactile perception of direction in relation to hemispheric locus of lesion. Fontenot DJ; Benton AL Neuropsychologia; 1971 Mar; 9(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 5146489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The significance of time intervals in auditory interaction effects. Diamond SP; Snow EA; Bender MB Trans Am Neurol Assoc; 1967; 92():184-7. PubMed ID: 5634027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Dichotic auditory fusion levels in children with learning disabilities. Haggerty R; Stamm JS Neuropsychologia; 1978; 16(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 703949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Interhemispheric effects on choice reaction times to one-, two-, and three-letter displays. Umiltá C; Frost N; Hyman R J Exp Psychol; 1972 Apr; 93(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 5013334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Participation of the callosal system in the process of signal discrimination from noise]. Bianki VL; Shurgaia GG; Koroleva IV Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1980 Nov; 66(11):1617-25. PubMed ID: 7439451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cross-modal asymmetries in perception related to asymmetry in cerebral function. Hines D; Satz P Neuropsychologia; 1974 Mar; 12(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 4842383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Hemispheric asymmetry of reaction time in a dichotic discrimination task. Levy CM; Bowers D Cortex; 1974 Mar; 10(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 4455440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]