These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5159697)

  • 1. [Comparison of electrocohleographic and audiographic thresholds. Statistical study].
    Aran JM; Charlet de Sauvage R; Pèlerin J
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1971; 92(9):477-91. PubMed ID: 5159697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Theoretical and practical aspects of electrocochleographic recordings according to the method established in Bordeaux].
    Aran JM; Pèlerin J; Lenoir J; Portmann C; Darrouzet J
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1971 Nov; 92():Suppl:601-44. PubMed ID: 5148985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Role of the basal cochlea in the genesis of evoked acoustic oto-emissions in the subject with normal hearing].
    el-Bez M; Avan P; Erminy M; François M; Bonfils P
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994; 111(8):443-9. PubMed ID: 7645896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Objective examination of hearing by means of registration of average evoked potentials].
    Khechinashvili SN; Kevanishvili Sh; Kadzhaia OA; Khachidze OA; Afonchenoko VS
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1974; (3):30-6. PubMed ID: 4619505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Various audiometry tests designated as objective].
    Freyss G; Legent F
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1969 Mar; 86(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 5769827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of hearing thresholds using the Cochlea-Scan. Comment to: A pilot study on assessing hearing threshold using the Cochlea-Scan. Stavros Hatzopoulos, Krzyszof Kochanek, Lech Sliwa, Henryk Skarzynski. Med Sci Monit, 2008; 14(4): MT7-11.
    Schmuziger N; Probst R
    Med Sci Monit; 2009 Jul; 15(7):LE7-8. PubMed ID: 19564833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological tests for hearing.
    Beagley HA
    Proc R Soc Med; 1975 Jan; 68(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 1187665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [An electrophysiological study of frequency selectivity in audiology].
    Harrison RV; Dauman R; Aran JM; Negrevergne M
    J Otolaryngol; 1983 Apr; 12(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 6864855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of auditory brainstem response and behavioral audiometry in infants.
    Ruth RA; Horner JS; McCoy GS; Chandler CR
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1983; 17():94-8. PubMed ID: 6577570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of round window removal on auditory thresholds in cats.
    McClure JA; Lycett P
    J Otolaryngol; 1980 Jun; 9(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 7431468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methods in electrocochleography.
    Eggermont JJ; Odenthal DW
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974; 316():17-24. PubMed ID: 4601037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Expediency of applying speech audiometry by bone conductivity for the diagnosis of the status of the receptor apparatus of the cochlea].
    Dunaĭvitser BI
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1969; 29(4):7-12. PubMed ID: 5387132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing: travelling wave or resonance?
    Bell A
    PLoS Biol; 2004 Oct; 2(10):e337. PubMed ID: 15486577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Electrocochleography].
    Aran JM
    Presse Med (1893); 1971 Oct; 79(42):1847-8. PubMed ID: 5119040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Electrocochleogram].
    Burian K; Gestring GF
    Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1971; 105(4):166-7. PubMed ID: 5114207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evoked response audiometry under sedation.
    Burian K; Gestring GF; Hruby S
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1970 Feb; 28(2):215. PubMed ID: 4189934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of ethacrynic acid on the cochlea.
    Youngblood JW; Cohn ES; Warfield DW
    Surg Forum; 1969; 20():476-7. PubMed ID: 5383121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Correlation of auditory brainstem evoked potentials and pure tone audiometric thresholds].
    Martínez Ibarguen A
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1993; 44(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 8357628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Study of the mechanism of auditory adaptation by simultaneous recording of cortical auditory evoked potentials and cochlear microphonic potentials].
    Sagalovich BM; Melkumova GG
    Biull Eksp Biol Med; 1981 May; 91(5):520-2. PubMed ID: 7260374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.