These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5160055)

  • 1. Factor analyses of the de Hirsch Predictive Index.
    Adkins PL; Holmes GR; Schnackenberg RC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Dec; 33(3):1319-25. PubMed ID: 5160055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the Minnesota Perceptual Diagnostic Test Revised and the Bender Gestalt.
    Vance B; Fuller GB; Lester ML
    J Learn Disabil; 1986 Apr; 19(4):211-4. PubMed ID: 3701215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of two tests of visual-motor skill.
    Fineberg BL; Sowards SK; Cochran GM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Feb; 48(1):156. PubMed ID: 450612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The clinical evaluation of school difficulties.
    Menkes JH
    Neuropadiatrie; 1974 Aug; 5(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 4612405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cerebral dysfunctions--clarification, delineation, classification.
    Block WM
    Behav Neuropsychiatry; 1973 Oct-1974 Mar; 5(7-12):13-7. PubMed ID: 4139948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Southern California Sensory Integration Tests (Ayres) and the Bender Gestalt: a correlative study.
    Kimball JG
    Am J Occup Ther; 1977; 31(5):294-9. PubMed ID: 324289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of learning disabled children's performance on Bender Visual-Motor Gestalt Test and Beery's Developmental Test of Visual Motor Integration.
    Skeen JA; Strong VN; Book RM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Dec; 55(3 Pt 2):1257-8. PubMed ID: 7167322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cost analysis approach to optimizing test selection.
    Wendler CL; Roid GH
    J Learn Disabil; 1984; 17(7):400-5. PubMed ID: 6434677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychologic tests: a guide for pediatricians.
    Louick D; Boland TB
    Pediatr Ann; 1978 Dec; 7(12):86-101. PubMed ID: 84373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of educationally handicapped students scores on the Revised Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration and Bender-Gestalt.
    Breen MJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Jun; 54(3 Pt 2):1227-30. PubMed ID: 7110865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Factors of visual perception].
    Wurst E
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1974; 21(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 4424864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scores on Bender-Gestalt and Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration of learning-disabled children.
    Spirito A
    Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Jun; 50(3 Pt 2):1214. PubMed ID: 7413395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evolutive examination and learning difficulties].
    Tellechea Rotta N
    Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 1975 Jun; 33(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 1147796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. BIP-Bender protocols of learning disabled and regular education students.
    Mallinger BL; Longley KF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Aug; 67(1):193-4. PubMed ID: 3211672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are certain learning disturbances a definite disease?
    Fish N; Hutchins WW
    J Maine Med Assoc; 1972 Apr; 63(4):68-74. PubMed ID: 5018381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of visual motor perception in children with developmental articulation and phonological disorders.
    Ozcebe E; Kirazli MC; Sevinc S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Jun; 108(3):862-72. PubMed ID: 19725321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An examination of three tests of visual-motor integration.
    Aylward EH; Schmidt S
    J Learn Disabil; 1986; 19(6):328-30. PubMed ID: 3734612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter-scorer reliability on the Bender Gestalt Test and the Revised Visual Retention Test.
    Egeland B; Rice J; Penny S
    Am J Ment Defic; 1967 Jul; 72(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 6063956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Background Interference Procedure and discriminant function analysis in predicting clinically determined categories of learning disability.
    Mallinger BI
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Jun; 44(3 Pt 1):767-76. PubMed ID: 876784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of children with and without learning disabilities on Canter's Background Interference Procedure and Koppitz's scoring system for the Bender test.
    Mitchell-Burns JA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Jun; 90(3 Pt 1):875-82. PubMed ID: 10883769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.