These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5160084)
1. [The relation between the inertia effect and the sequential position of disconfirming events in the revision of subjective probability]. Grabitz HJ Psychol Forsch; 1971; 35(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 5160084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. fNIRS derived hemodynamic signals and electrodermal responses in a sequential risk-taking task. Holper L; ten Brincke RH; Wolf M; Murphy RO Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 1557():141-54. PubMed ID: 24530267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ESTIMATION OF CONTINUOUS SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS IN A SEQUENTIAL DECISION TASK. ESD-TDR-64-607. RAPOPORT A Tech Doc Rep U S Air Force Syst Command Electron Syst Div; 1964 Oct; 69():1-19. PubMed ID: 14313031 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. HOPE OF SUCCESS, FEAR OF FAILURE, SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITY, AND RISK-TAKING BEHAVIOR. DECHARMS R; DAVE PN J Pers Soc Psychol; 1965 Jun; 1():558-68. PubMed ID: 14300231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Attention and responsivity to remote dangers: a laboratory simulation for assessing reactions to threatening events. Rothbart M; Mellinger M J Pers Soc Psychol; 1972 Oct; 24(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 5079548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sequential effects in the revision of subjective probabilities. Pitz GF; Downing L; Reinhold H Can J Psychol; 1967 Oct; 21(5):381-93. PubMed ID: 6065714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. ESTIMATION OF CONTINUOUS SUBJECTIVE PROBABILIT DISTRIBUTIONS IN A SEQUENTIAL DECISION TASK. RAPOPORT A Hum Factors; 1964 Oct; 6():433-44. PubMed ID: 14300935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. SENSITIVITY OF SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITY REVISION. PETERSON CR; MILLER AJ J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jul; 70():117-21. PubMed ID: 14315121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Personality components of decision making. II. Relationships between decision-making behavior and behavioral stereotypy proneness. Goldsmith RW Psychol Forsch; 1972; 35(3):187-212. PubMed ID: 5085976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Are Bayesian decisions artificially intelligent? The effect of task and personality on conservatism in processing information. Alker HA; Hermann MG J Pers Soc Psychol; 1971 Jul; 19(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 5558338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. RISK IN DECISION MAKING AS A FUNCTION OF AGE, SEX, AND PROBABILITY PREFERENCE. KASS N Child Dev; 1964 Jun; 35():577-82. PubMed ID: 14163561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. PROBABILITY PREFERENCES AND EXPECTED VALUES. SCODEL A J Psychol; 1963 Oct; 56():429-34. PubMed ID: 14051987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Decision strategy as a function of uncertainty of the result: I. Latency of the decision]. Proteau L; Alain C Can J Appl Sport Sci; 1983 Jun; 8(2):63-71. PubMed ID: 6883615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. PREDICTING DECISION MAKING BEHAVIOR FROM PERSONALITY AND COGNITIVE VARIABLES. TECHN DOCUM REP NO. ESD-TDR-64-619. TOWNSEND JC; SMITH WJ Tech Doc Rep U S Air Force Syst Command Electron Syst Div; 1964 Nov; 10():1-62. PubMed ID: 14262976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A primacy effect in subjective probability revision. Peterson CR; DuCharme WM J Exp Psychol; 1967 Jan; 73(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 6031669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of feedback mode and task difficulty on quality of timing decisions in a zero-sum game. Tikuisis P; Vartanian O; Mandel DR Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1062-76. PubMed ID: 25277017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]