These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5163657)

  • 1. Closing remarks to the round table on auditory masking.
    König E
    Audiology; 1971; 10(3):146-63. PubMed ID: 5163657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Speech discrimination in prescence of noise in different kinds of hearing loss (author's transl)].
    Hahn R
    Audiology; 1974; 13(6):485-9. PubMed ID: 4410930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-frequency audiometry. Masking of air- and bone-conduction signals.
    Hallmo P; Sundby A; Mair IW
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 1641573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
    Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-frequency audiometry. Masking in electric bone-conduction audiometry.
    Löppönen H
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 1585128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new masking transducer with low contralateral transmission.
    Lescouflair G
    Audiology; 1974; 13(2):112-25. PubMed ID: 4814982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus on speech recognition over air and bone conduction military communications headsets.
    Manning C; Mermagen T; Scharine A
    Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():67-75. PubMed ID: 27989949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An examination of the effects of broadband air-conduction masker on the speech intelligibility of speech-modulated bone-conduction ultrasound.
    Nishimura T; Okayasu T; Saito O; Shimokura R; Yamashita A; Yamanaka T; Hosoi H; Kitahara T
    Hear Res; 2014 Nov; 317():41-9. PubMed ID: 25285623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binaural Hearing Ability With Bilateral Bone Conduction Stimulation in Subjects With Normal Hearing: Implications for Bone Conduction Hearing Aids.
    Zeitooni M; Mäki-Torkko E; Stenfelt S
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):690-702. PubMed ID: 27560492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The masked threshold to noise ratio in brainstem electric response audiometry: assessment of the conductive loss component by bone-conducted masking.
    Janssen EA; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
    Audiology; 1993; 32(3):153-63. PubMed ID: 8489476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nabelek AK; Pickett JM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Dec; 17(4):724-39. PubMed ID: 4444292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone-conduction masking for threshold assessment in auditory brain stem response testing.
    Webb KC; Greenberg HJ
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 6628853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of contralateral broad-band noise on frequency discrimination.
    Labiak JM; Wilson WR
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1974; 77(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 4829051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative effective frequency response of bone versus air conduction stimulation examined via masking.
    Durrant JD; Hyre R
    Audiology; 1993; 32(3):175-84. PubMed ID: 8489478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I; Beach EF; Sharma M; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
    Mens LH
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noise audiometer.
    Tobias JV
    J Speech Hear Res; 1972 Dec; 15(4):781-7. PubMed ID: 4652399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of conductive hearing loss on the masking-level difference: insert versus standard earphones.
    Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 May; 95(5 Pt 1):2652-7. PubMed ID: 8207138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Perception of acoustic signals during masked air and bone-tissue conduction].
    Tsisarenko AN; Moroz BS; Bazarov VG
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1985; 11(5):724-9. PubMed ID: 4076647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.