These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5163897)

  • 1. Phoneme discrimination in older persons under varying signal-to-noise conditions.
    Smith RA; Prather WF
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Sep; 14(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 5163897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-based auditory phoneme discrimination training improves speech recognition in noise in experienced adult cochlear implant listeners.
    Schumann A; Serman M; Gefeller O; Hoppe U
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 25549690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory phoneme discrimination in illiterates: mismatch negativity--a question of literacy?
    Schaadt G; Pannekamp A; van der Meer E
    Dev Psychol; 2013 Nov; 49(11):2179-90. PubMed ID: 23379298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phoneme and Word Scoring in Speech-in-Noise Audiometry.
    Billings CJ; Penman TM; Ellis EM; Baltzell LS; McMillan GP
    Am J Audiol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 26989823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discriminability, response bias, and phoneme categories in discrimination of voice onset time.
    Wood CC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1976 Dec; 60(6):1381-9. PubMed ID: 1010890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise.
    Xu L; Zheng Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1758. PubMed ID: 17927435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Results using the OPAL strategy in Mandarin speaking cochlear implant recipients.
    Vandali AE; Dawson PW; Arora K
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S74-S85. PubMed ID: 27329178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of spatially separated sound sources on speech intelligibility.
    Dirks DD; Wilson RH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1969 Mar; 12(1):5-38. PubMed ID: 5779912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The development of auditory figure-ground discrimination and ear asymmetry under nonaural stimulus presentation.
    Howland A; Rasbury W; Heilman KM; Hammer L
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 1975 Jun; 17(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 1204986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased activity in frontal motor cortex compensates impaired speech perception in older adults.
    Du Y; Buchsbaum BR; Grady CL; Alain C
    Nat Commun; 2016 Aug; 7():12241. PubMed ID: 27483187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of auditory-visual vowel identification training on speech recognition under difficult listening conditions.
    Richie C; Kewley-Port D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 51(6):1607-19. PubMed ID: 18695021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intelligibility characteristics of superior esophageal speech presented under various levels of masking noise.
    Horii Y; Weinberg B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 1186150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Further investigation of vowel items in multiple-choice speech discrimination testing.
    Owens E; Benedict M; Schubert ED
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Dec; 14(4):841-7. PubMed ID: 5163913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Children's identification and reproduction of (w), (r), and (l).
    Menyuk P; Anderson S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1969 Mar; 12(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 5779910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Improvement in Phoneme Discrimination in Noise in Normal Hearing Adults].
    Schumann A; Garea Garcia L; Hoppe U
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2017 Feb; 96(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 27632530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduced sensitivity to slow-rate dynamic auditory information in children with dyslexia.
    Poelmans H; Luts H; Vandermosten M; Boets B; Ghesquière P; Wouters J
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(6):2810-9. PubMed ID: 21645986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intelligibility of time-compressed speech: the effect of uniform versus non-uniform time-compression algorithms.
    Schlueter A; Lemke U; Kollmeier B; Holube I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1541-55. PubMed ID: 24606289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.