These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5163913)

  • 1. Further investigation of vowel items in multiple-choice speech discrimination testing.
    Owens E; Benedict M; Schubert ED
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Dec; 14(4):841-7. PubMed ID: 5163913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrimination of level differences by hearing-impaired patients.
    Fastl H; Schorn K
    Audiology; 1981; 20(6):488-502. PubMed ID: 7316885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Technical characteristics of the Békésy audiometer in diagnosis].
    Keller F
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1972 Oct; 51(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 5081039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can present day audiology really help in diagnosis? An otologist's question.
    Coles RR
    J Laryngol Otol; 1972 Mar; 86(3):191-224. PubMed ID: 5014913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Masking level differences encountered in clinical populations.
    Olsen WO; Noffsinger D; Carhart R
    Audiology; 1976; 15(4):287-301. PubMed ID: 1275814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A critique of speech recognition testing preliminary to hearing therapy.
    Schultz MC
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1972 May; 37(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 5027358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Difference limen for intensity in patients with sudden deafness and other inner ear disorders.
    Schorn K
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1981; 27():100-9. PubMed ID: 7325052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The Short Increment Sensitivity Index (SISI) test in audiological symptoms. (Results obtained with scaled increment values)].
    Lenzi P; Cavallazzi G
    Arch Ital Otol Rinol Laringol Patol Cervicofacc; 1968; 79(6):764-78. PubMed ID: 4393855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of white noise on PB scores of normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Keith RW; Talis HP
    Audiology; 1972; 11(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 4669918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses.
    Carhart R; Tillman TW
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1970 Mar; 91(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 5414080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The testing of Boenninghaus' and Röser's new tables for the determination of percentile hearing loss].
    Brusis T; Feldmann H
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1973 Mar; 52(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 4698064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Correlation of tone and speech supraliminal tests in the diagnosis of various forms of hearing impairment].
    Chupiĭ LV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1973; 35(5):22-7. PubMed ID: 4754583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [New tables for the determination of percentile loss of speech hearing].
    Boenninghaus HG; Röser D
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1973 Mar; 52(3):153-61. PubMed ID: 4698063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Review of sensorineural hearing loss.
    Paparella MM
    Am J Otol; 1984 Apr; 5(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 6372504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binaural discrimination of "everyday" speech.
    Aniansson G
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1973 Apr; 75(4):334-6. PubMed ID: 4702635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of one new and three old tests of auditory adaptation.
    Olsen WO; Noffsinger D
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1974 Feb; 99(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 4809949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Fairbanks Rhyme Test and CID auditory test W-22 in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kopra LL; Blosser D; Waldron DL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Dec; 11(4):735-9. PubMed ID: 5719227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of talker differences on vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nábĕlek AK; Czyzewski Z; Krishnan LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1228-46. PubMed ID: 1401512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory adaptation at threshold intensities.
    Palva T; Kärjä J; Palva A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1966 Jun; ():Suppl 224:195+. PubMed ID: 5992669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rationale and standardization for a combined speech articulation and auditory discrimination test.
    Hutchinson BB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Dec; 33(3):715-21. PubMed ID: 5127190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.