These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

49 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5164332)

  • 1. [Specific intensity of vowels].
    Rossi M
    Phonetica; 1971; 24(3):129-61. PubMed ID: 5164332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vowel perception: experiments with a single-electrode cochlear implant.
    Doyle KJ; Danhauer JL; Edgerton BJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 3755193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attention modulates auditory adaptation produced by amplitude modulation.
    Kawashima T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):EL123-7. PubMed ID: 19894786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds.
    Aiken SJ; Picton TW
    Hear Res; 2008 Nov; 245(1-2):35-47. PubMed ID: 18765275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory nerve representation of vowels in background noise.
    Sachs MB; Voigt HF; Young ED
    J Neurophysiol; 1983 Jul; 50(1):27-45. PubMed ID: 6875649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Relation between the subjective loudness of the sound and the numbers of just noticeable differences in the intensity for 4 characteristic frequencies].
    Emerit E
    Phonetica; 1972; 25(2):72-107. PubMed ID: 5072539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a Mandarin monosyllable test material with homogenous items (I): homogeneity selection.
    Ji F; Xi X; Chen AT; Ying J; Wang QJ; Yang SM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 131(9):962-9. PubMed ID: 21534715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The clinical utility of expressing hearing thresholds in terms of the forward-going sound pressure wave.
    Withnell RH; Jeng PS; Parent P; Levitt H
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Aug; 53(8):522-30. PubMed ID: 24825368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Categorical results do not imply categorical perception.
    Hary JM; Massaro DW
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Nov; 32(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 7162941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Plucks and bows are categorically perceived, sometimes.
    Cutting JE
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 May; 31(5):462-76. PubMed ID: 7110905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception and neural representation of size-variant human vowels in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus).
    Schebesch G; Lingner A; Firzlaff U; Wiegrebe L; Grothe B
    Hear Res; 2010 Mar; 261(1-2):1-8. PubMed ID: 20004713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual restoration of obliterated sounds.
    Warren RM
    Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):371-83. PubMed ID: 6385048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Asymmetries in the processing of vowel height.
    Scharinger M; Monahan PJ; Idsardi WJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):903-18. PubMed ID: 22232394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of psychophysical models of auditory change perception.
    Micheyl C; Kaernbach C; Demany L
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Oct; 115(4):1069-83. PubMed ID: 18954215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory nerve representation of naturally-produced vowels with variable acoustics.
    Stevens HE; Wickesberg RE
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):21-34. PubMed ID: 15953512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Acoustic" parameters of front vowels.
    Zhukov SYa ; Chistovich LA
    Hum Physiol; 1985; 11(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 4093143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The vowel inherent spectral change of English vowels spoken by native and non-native speakers.
    Jin SH; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL363-9. PubMed ID: 23656095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining perceived sound quality in a simulated hearing aid using the international speech test signal.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Moats P
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):533-5. PubMed ID: 21325947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peripheral and central aspects of auditory across-frequency processing.
    Ernst SM; Verhey JL
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():246-55. PubMed ID: 17825272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory evoked field at threshold.
    Lütkenhöner B; Klein JS
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):188-200. PubMed ID: 17434696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.