These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5165963)

  • 1. [Studies on the masking of speech by white noise].
    Yamamura K; Okada A
    Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 1971 Aug; 26(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 5165963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise.
    Gustafsson HA; Arlinger SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):518-29. PubMed ID: 8120263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of monosyllabic discrimination tests in white noise for differentiating among hearing aids.
    Beattie RC; Edgerton BJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1976 Nov; 41(4):464-76. PubMed ID: 994477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.
    Bacon SP; Opie JM; Montoya DY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 41(3):549-63. PubMed ID: 9638921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of masking on the activation of auditory-associated cortex during speech listening in white noise.
    Hwang JH; Wu CW; Chen JH; Liu TC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Sep; 126(9):916-20. PubMed ID: 16864487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informativeness of critical ratios "useful signal-masking noise" in speech communication.
    Tzaneva L
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 1998 Nov; 6(4):293-5. PubMed ID: 9919381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial Release From Masking in Children: Effects of Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Corbin NE; Buss E; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):223-235. PubMed ID: 27787392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Masking and fatigue effects of white noise in connection with speech tests in otosclerotic subjects.
    SAMBATARO C; PESTALOZZA G
    Laryngoscope; 1953 Aug; 63(8):732-8. PubMed ID: 13098182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech recognition in noise, temporal and spectral resolution in normal and impaired hearing.
    Arlinger S; Dryselius H
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():30-7. PubMed ID: 2356736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability.
    Kalikow DN; Stevens KN; Elliott LL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1977 May; 61(5):1337-51. PubMed ID: 881487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Babble and random-noise masking of speech in high and low context cue conditions.
    Lewis HD; Benignus VA; Muller KE; Malott CM; Barton CN
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Mar; 31(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 3352248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech Masking in Normal and Impaired Hearing: Interactions Between Frequency Selectivity and Inherent Temporal Fluctuations in Noise.
    Oxenham AJ; Kreft HA
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():125-132. PubMed ID: 27080653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Nelson PB; Jin SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2286-94. PubMed ID: 15139640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.
    Fogerty D; Xu J; Gibbs BE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1800. PubMed ID: 27914381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Speech tests: application in individuals with noise induced hearing loss].
    Moreira RR; Ferreira Junior M
    Pro Fono; 2004; 16(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 15609584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
    Goossens T; Vercammen C; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss.
    Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Snik AF; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of single-microphone noise reduction schemes: can hearing impaired listeners tell the difference?
    Huber R; Bisitz T; Gerkmann T; Kiessling J; Meister H; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S55-S61. PubMed ID: 28112001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noise reduction hearing aids: release from masking and release from distortion.
    Van Tasell DJ; Crain TR
    Ear Hear; 1992 Apr; 13(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 1601192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.