These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5165963)

  • 21. Do adaptive frequency response (AFR) hearing aids reduce 'upward spread' of masking?
    Fabry DA; Leek MR; Walden BE; Cord M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 8126656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Review of four new indices of susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss.
    Humes LE
    J Occup Med; 1977 Feb; 19(2):116-8. PubMed ID: 839285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A recommendation for calibration and choice of masking noises used in speech audiometry].
    Ingold L; Tschopp K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Jun; 71(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 1637453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Masking Period Patterns and Forward Masking for Speech-Shaped Noise: Age-Related Effects.
    Grose JH; Menezes DC; Porter HL; Griz S
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 26230495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Time-frequency masking for speech separation and its potential for hearing aid design.
    DeLiang Wang
    Trends Amplif; 2008 Dec; 12(4):332-53. PubMed ID: 18974204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Masking release and modulation interference in cochlear implant and simulation listeners.
    Jin SH; Nie Y; Nelson P
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):135-46. PubMed ID: 23800809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of selected masking noises on Lombard and sidetone amplification effects.
    Garber SF; Siegel GM; Pick HL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Sep; 19(3):523-35. PubMed ID: 979214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94. PubMed ID: 12703719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Distinct neural systems recruited when speech production is modulated by different masking sounds.
    Meekings S; Evans S; Lavan N; Boebinger D; Krieger-Redwood K; Cooke M; Scott SK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):8. PubMed ID: 27475128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in every-day listening situations.
    Aniansson G
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974; 320():1-50. PubMed ID: 4532460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech reflection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults.
    Huang Y; Huang Q; Chen X; Qu T; Wu X; Li L
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):51-65. PubMed ID: 18694813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Auditory processing disorder and speech perception problems in noise: finding the underlying origin.
    Lagacé J; Jutras B; Gagné JP
    Am J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 19(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 20308289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contributions of comodulation masking release and temporal resolution to the speech-reception threshold masked by an interfering voice.
    Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1295-300. PubMed ID: 8408970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Masking of speech in young and elderly listeners with hearing loss.
    Souza PE; Turner CW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 8084195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Most comfortable loudness for pure tones and speech in the presence of masking noise.
    Richards AM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):498-505. PubMed ID: 1186159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Noise-induced hearing loss and the comprehension of speech in noise.
    Quist-Hanssen S; Thorud E; Aasand G
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1979; 360():90-5. PubMed ID: 287364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Speech production modifications produced by competing talkers, babble, and stationary noise.
    Lu Y; Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3261-75. PubMed ID: 19045809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.