These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. MR imaging pelvimetry: a useful adjunct in the treatment of women at risk for dystocia? Spörri S; Thoeny HC; Raio L; Lachat R; Vock P; Schneider H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 12076922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Indication for cesarean section: determination of C.P.D]. Takei J Sanfujinka No Jissai; 1972 Jan; 21(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 5067258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pelvic measurements and outcome of labour. Jennings EE Radiography; 1982 Sep; 48(573):190-2. PubMed ID: 7146354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The utilization and efficacy of pelvimetry. Kelly KM; Madden DA; Arcarese JS; Barnett M; Brown RF Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1975 Sep; 125(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 1200222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between increasing birthweight and cephalopelvic disproportion in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Mtimavalye LA; van der Does CD; Maathuis JB J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw; 1974 May; 81(5):380-2. PubMed ID: 4832318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors related to the increasing cesarean section rates for cephalopelvic disproportion. Silbar EL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 May; 154(5):1095-8. PubMed ID: 3706435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry and the prediction of labor dystocia. Zaretsky MV; Alexander JM; McIntire DD; Hatab MR; Twickler DM; Leveno KJ Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):919-26. PubMed ID: 16260507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool to evaluate dystocia. Spörri S; Hänggi W; Braghetti A; Vock P; Schneider H Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 89(6):902-8. PubMed ID: 9170462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing cephalopelvic disproportion: back to the basics. Maharaj D Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2010 Jun; 65(6):387-95. PubMed ID: 20633305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Significant indices of relative dystocia]. Bernier G; Guimond P; Sansregret A Union Med Can; 1970 Apr; 99(4):672-6. PubMed ID: 5511491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement of obstetric conjugate by ultrasonic tomography and its significance. Katanozaka M; Yoshinaga M; Fuchiwaki K; Nagata Y Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 180(1 Pt 1):159-62. PubMed ID: 9914597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of the usefulness of x-ray pelvimetry: comparison of the Thoms and modified Ball methods with manual pelvimetry. Fine EA; Bracken M; Berkowitz RL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 May; 137(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 7369283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contracted pelvis. BROWN R Edinb Med J; 1954 Jun; 61(6):181-99. PubMed ID: 13161840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiographic pelvimetry for assessment of dystocia in bitches: a clinical study in two terrier breeds. Eneroth A; Linde-Forsberg C; Uhlhorn M; Hall M J Small Anim Pract; 1999 Jun; 40(6):257-64. PubMed ID: 10404485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]