These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5172929)

  • 1. Alterations in pain perception under conditions of multiple sensory modality stimulation.
    Fellner CH
    Psychosomatics; 1971; 12(5):313-5. PubMed ID: 5172929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Heteromodal cueing and auditory-visual interaction: a literature review.
    Klayman BE
    J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 83(2d Half):173-99. PubMed ID: 4705714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection and the timing of a heteromodal cue: auditory-visual interaction.
    Klayman BE
    J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 83(2d Half):201-13. PubMed ID: 4705715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modality-specificity of sensory aging in vision and audition: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Ceponiene R; Westerfield M; Torki M; Townsend J
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():53-68. PubMed ID: 18482717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the internal consistency of magnitude estimations.
    Atkinson WH; Ward LM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Dec; 35(3):903-13. PubMed ID: 4643984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modality and prior habituation as critical factors in development of rapid discriminated conditioned suppression in rats.
    Corwin JV; Slaughter JS
    Psychol Rep; 1976 Jun; 38(3 Pt 2):1259-65. PubMed ID: 935319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities.
    Duncan J; Martens S; Ward R
    Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6635):808-10. PubMed ID: 9194561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The contributions of sensory dominance and attentional bias to cross-modal enhancement of visual cortex excitability.
    Romei V; Murray MM; Cappe C; Thut G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 25(7):1122-35. PubMed ID: 23384192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Crossmodal interactions and multisensory integration in the perception of audio-visual motion -- a free-field study.
    Schmiedchen K; Freigang C; Nitsche I; Rübsamen R
    Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 1466():99-111. PubMed ID: 22617375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attention to simultaneous unrelated auditory and visual events: behavioral and neural correlates.
    Johnson JA; Zatorre RJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Oct; 15(10):1609-20. PubMed ID: 15716469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Timing is everything: changes in presentation rate have opposite effects on auditory and visual implicit statistical learning.
    Emberson LL; Conway CM; Christiansen MH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):1021-40. PubMed ID: 21347988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brain networks underlying mental imagery of auditory and visual information.
    Zvyagintsev M; Clemens B; Chechko N; Mathiak KA; Sack AT; Mathiak K
    Eur J Neurosci; 2013 May; 37(9):1421-34. PubMed ID: 23383863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interaction between endogenous and exogenous orienting in crossmodal attention.
    Chen X; Chen Q; Gao D; Yue Z
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 22670628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Division of attention between simultaneous and successive nonverbal signals varying in discriminability.
    Long J
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1977 Feb; 29(1):7-30. PubMed ID: 860007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of static background cues on classical fear conditioning.
    Goldstein ML
    J Gen Psychol; 1974 Jul; 91(1st Half):145-51. PubMed ID: 4418536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Divided attention, order of report and responses to immediately successive signals.
    Long J
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1976 Aug; 28(3):339-53. PubMed ID: 1005647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory and visual differences in time perception? An investigation from a developmental perspective with neuropsychological tests.
    Zélanti PS; Droit-Volet S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Jul; 112(3):296-311. PubMed ID: 22621934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.