These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 517676)
1. Positive contrast in the rat: a test of the additivity theory. Nallan GB; McCoy DF Am J Psychol; 1979 Sep; 92(3):449-61. PubMed ID: 517676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Antecedent reinforcement contingencies in the stimulus control of an auditory discrimination. Pierrel R; Blue S J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Nov; 10(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 6080833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence of interaction between deprivation effects and stimulus control. Powell RW J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Jul; 16(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 5142390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock. Reed P; Yoshino T Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the form of stimulus generalization curves for visual intensity. Ernst AJ; Engberg L; Thomas DR J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Sep; 16(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 5121854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acquisition and extinction of an operant response in differentially reared rats. Gluck JP; Pearce HE Dev Psychobiol; 1977 Mar; 10(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 838159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reinforcement frequency, but not gender, determines sensitivity to discriminative stimulus effects of morphine. Craft RM; Morgan CL; Bernal SA Behav Pharmacol; 1998 Jul; 9(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 10065924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential responding as a function of auditory stimulus intensity without differential reinforcement. Blue S; Sherman JG; Pierrel R J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 May; 15(3):371-7. PubMed ID: 5577169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Some effects of response-independent reinforcement on auditory generalization gradients. Huff RC; Sherman JE; Cohn M J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jan; 23(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 1117248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining operant-baseline-derived conditioned excitors and inhibitors from the same and different incentive classes: an investigation of appetitive-aversive interactions. Weiss SJ; Thomas DA; Weissman RD Q J Exp Psychol B; 1996 Nov; 49(4):357-81. PubMed ID: 8962540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Group behavior of rats under schedules of reinforcement. Grott R; Neuringer A J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Sep; 22(2):311-21. PubMed ID: 4413600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of timing and classical conditioning. Holder MD; Roberts S J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Apr; 11(2):172-93. PubMed ID: 4009120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inactivation of dorsolateral striatum enhances sensitivity to changes in the action-outcome contingency in instrumental conditioning. Yin HH; Knowlton BJ; Balleine BW Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 166(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 16153716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effects of change-over-delay in the signal-key procedure]. Manabe K; Kawashima T Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1982 Dec; 53(5):304-7. PubMed ID: 7169710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Probability analysis of elements of rat behavior after sudden and signalled interruption of food reinforcement]. Belenkov NIu; Gracheva VV; Stepanov II Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1985; 35(3):473-9. PubMed ID: 4036323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]