These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 519133)
81. Thirteen days: Joseph Delboeuf versus Pierre Janet on the nature of hypnotic suggestion. LeBlanc A J Hist Behav Sci; 2004; 40(2):123-47. PubMed ID: 15048665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. The impact of a confusion technique on hypnotic responsivity in low-susceptible subjects. Stanger T; Tucker CM; Morgan JI Am J Clin Hypn; 1996 Jan; 38(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 8712164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. The relationship between memory, suggestibility and hypnotic responsivity. Eisen ML Am J Clin Hypn; 1996 Oct; 39(2):126-37. PubMed ID: 8936713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Identifying Systematic Disobedience in Milgram's Obedience Experiments: A Meta-Analytic Review. Packer DJ Perspect Psychol Sci; 2008 Jul; 3(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 26158949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. The cognitive demands of hypnotic response. Wyzenbeek M; Bryant RA Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2012; 60(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 22098570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Hypnosis decouples cognitive control from conflict monitoring processes of the frontal lobe. Egner T; Jamieson G; Gruzelier J Neuroimage; 2005 Oct; 27(4):969-78. PubMed ID: 15964211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Automaticity and hypnosis: a sociocognitive account. Lynn SJ Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 9204637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Role of relaxation and specific suggestions in hypnotic emotional numbing. Sebastiani L; D'Alessandro L; Menicucci D; Ghelarducci B; Santarcangelo EL Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jan; 63(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 17141344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Relaxation strategies and enhancement of hypnotic susceptibility: EEG neurofeedback, progressive muscle relaxation and self-hypnosis. Batty MJ; Bonnington S; Tang BK; Hawken MB; Gruzelier JH Brain Res Bull; 2006 Dec; 71(1-3):83-90. PubMed ID: 17113932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Obedience to authority as a function of the physical proximity of the student, teacher, and experimenter. Dolinski D; Grzyb T J Soc Psychol; 2024 May; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 38696401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Hypnotic deafness: a psychophysical study of responses to tone intensity as modified by hypnosis. Crawford HJ; Macdonald H; Hilgard ER Am J Psychol; 1979 Jun; 92(2):193-214. PubMed ID: 474833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Multiple compliant processes: A reply to Haslam and Reicher on the engaged followership explanation of 'obedience' in Milgram's experiments. Hollander MM; Turowetz J Br J Soc Psychol; 2018 Apr; 57(2):301-309. PubMed ID: 29527775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. The effect of prior knowledge of hypnotic items on hypnotic performance and depth. Page RA; Handley GW Am J Clin Hypn; 1992 Oct; 35(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 1442645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Hypnosis, attention, and time cognition. Kurtz RM; Strube MJ Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2003 Oct; 51(4):400-13. PubMed ID: 14594188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. A truth that does not always speak its name: How Hollander and Turowetz's findings confirm and extend the engaged followership analysis of harm-doing in the Milgram paradigm. Haslam SA; Reicher SD Br J Soc Psychol; 2018 Apr; 57(2):292-300. PubMed ID: 29468707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Conversational assessment of hypnotic ability to promote hypnotic responsiveness. Kessler RS; Dane JR; Galper DI Am J Clin Hypn; 2002; 44(3-4):273-82. PubMed ID: 11799540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. An Embodied Perspective as a Victim of Sexual Harassment in Virtual Reality Reduces Action Conformity in a Later Milgram Obedience Scenario. Neyret S; Navarro X; Beacco A; Oliva R; Bourdin P; Valenzuela J; Barberia I; Slater M Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):6207. PubMed ID: 32277079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Gender and politics influenced the design and interpretation of Milgram's famous experiment. Push S Isis; 2012 Mar; 103(1):149; author reply 149-50. PubMed ID: 22655344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
99. Contesting the "Nature" Of Conformity: what Milgram and Zimbardo's studies really show. Haslam SA; Reicher SD PLoS Biol; 2012; 10(11):e1001426. PubMed ID: 23185132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. The response set theory of hypnosis reconsidered: toward an integrative model. Lynn SJ; Green JP; Zahedi A; Apelian C Am J Clin Hypn; 2023 Jan; 65(3):186-210. PubMed ID: 36108171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]