221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5192249)
1. Family planning; the needs and the methods.
Guttmacher AF
Am J Nurs; 1969 Jun; 69(6):1229-34. PubMed ID: 5192249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the availability of contraceptive methods in selected European countries and the United States.
Johansson ED
Rev Law Soc Change; 1997; 23(3):471-6. PubMed ID: 10725057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Who needs organized family planning services? A preliminary projection, 1971-1975.
Jaffe FS; Dryfoos JG; Varky G
Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Jul; 3(3):22-32. PubMed ID: 5122274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Contraceptive methods and devices. Updating the different medical problems].
Caletti G; Bassi R
Ann Sanita Pubblica; 1968; 29(2):271-329. PubMed ID: 4910024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Birth control. Future of the different contraceptive and abortion methods].
Vokaer R
Gynecol Obstet (Paris); 1971; 70(1):15-44. PubMed ID: 5088246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical, legal, and social implications of contraceptives for teenagers.
Daniels AM
Child Welfare; 1971 Mar; 50(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 5164339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Useful methods of contraception.
Whitehouse WL
Nurs Mirror Midwives J; 1974 Oct; 139(18):77-8. PubMed ID: 4497213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. METHODS OF CONTRACEPTION.
MEARS E
Practitioner; 1965 Apr; 194():470-7. PubMed ID: 14273193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Contraceptive failure rates: new estimates from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.
Fu H; Darroch JE; Haas T; Ranjit N
Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 10224543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. tudies of family planning in the Quinta Normal District of Santiago. The use of contraceptives.
Requena M
Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1965 Oct; 43(4):Suppl:69-99. PubMed ID: 5888519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Family planning].
Simoneti S
Minerva Ginecol; 1972 Oct; 24(10):492-4. PubMed ID: 4671766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Family planning and present law situation in Austria].
Husslein H
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1971 Mar; 83(9):141-4. PubMed ID: 5561281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Family planning in Lima, Peru.
Hall MF
Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1965 Oct; 43(4):Suppl:100-16. PubMed ID: 5888508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A manual of clinical contraception.
Bill HE
N C Med J; 1969 May; 30(5):169-82. PubMed ID: 5255114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Contraception and family planning: finding the best method. Part two.
Lippman D
Nurs Care; 1977 Aug; 10(8):26-7, 33. PubMed ID: 587321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Contraceptive development and better family planning.
Segal SJ
Bull N Y Acad Med; 1996; 73(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 8804742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Study of family planning. V. Contraceptive methods in women].
Castelazo-Ayala L; Zárate-Treviño A
Gac Med Mex; 1968 Sep; 98(9):1138-47. PubMed ID: 5719858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Searching of truth on abortion].
Hervet E
Gynecol Obstet (Paris); 1970; 69(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 5463967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contraceptive failure, method-related discontinuation and resumption of use: results from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.
Trussell J; Vaughan B
Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(2):64-72, 93. PubMed ID: 10224544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Role of counseling in present-day family planning].
Sundström-Feigenberg K
Lakartidningen; 1978 Feb; 75(7):552-7. PubMed ID: 628265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
