115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 520855)
1. [Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. A practical point of view].
Sánchez Guzmán JI
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1979 Aug; 46(274):139-40. PubMed ID: 520855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as determined by cytology and colposcopic biopsy.
Bamford PN; Beilby JO; Steele SJ; Vlies R
Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(5):482-4. PubMed ID: 6578644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Cytological classifications of vaginal smears. Current concepts of complex cytodiagnosis].
Kasabova M
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1984; 23(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 6385754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dysplasia and early neoplasia of the uterine cervix. A review.
Briggs RM
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1979 Jan; 34(1):70-99. PubMed ID: 375145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the abnormal Pap smear.
Homesley HD
Am Fam Physician; 1977 Sep; 16(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 900003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Colposcopic evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Cruikshank DP; Kaminsky DB; Ekbladh LE
J Reprod Med; 1976 Dec; 17(6):327-30. PubMed ID: 1003398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Diagnosis of cervical dysplasias].
Pérez Dettoma J; Santamaría M; Jurado M; Cabezón C; Domínquez J; de la Fuente F; López García G
Rev Med Univ Navarra; 1980 Dec; 24(4):26-9. PubMed ID: 7336009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Jobson VW
Am Fam Physician; 1981 Aug; 24(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 7258081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears.
Davis GL; Hernandez E; Davis JL; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jan; 69(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 3540762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cytological detection of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia].
Zavadilová H; Brichta J; Mendl V; Hrubá V; Krizová M; Tavlaridu E; Chadimová M
Cesk Patol; 1984 Aug; 20(3):151-60. PubMed ID: 6499016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Malignancy associated changes in cervical smears: systematic changes in cytometric features with the grade of dysplasia.
Guillaud M; Doudkine A; Garner D; MacAulay C; Palcic B
Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Oct; 9(3):191-204. PubMed ID: 8562458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Correlation between the cytology, coposcopy and the histopathology of abnormal lesions of the cervix].
Michon B; Demianczuk N
Union Med Can; 1977 May; 106(5):699-702. PubMed ID: 867611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Natural history of cervical dysplasia.
Spriggs AI
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Apr; 8(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 7021036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of methods for the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and a follow-up of the reaction of C.I.N. to biopsy.
Rylander E; Bjersing L; Angstrom T
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1979 Nov; 34(11):861-2. PubMed ID: 523043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening.
van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP; Gaillard HL; Go DM
Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3604538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inflammatory atypia on cervical smears. A diagnostic dilemma for the gynecologist.
Busseniers AE; Sidawy MK
J Reprod Med; 1991 Feb; 36(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 2010900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Infrared microspectroscopy and artificial neural networks in the diagnosis of cervical cancer.
Romeo M; Burden F; Quinn M; Wood B; McNaughton D
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 1998 Feb; 44(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 9551649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Shall we continue using the Papanicolaou's numerical classification in gynecological cytology?].
Cerón Esquivel A; Sereno Coló JA
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1979 Aug; 46(274):151-5. PubMed ID: 520856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
