These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5214466)

  • 41. Toothbrush age, wear, and plaque control.
    Hegde PP; Ashok KB; Ankola AV
    Indian J Dent Res; 2005; 16(2):61-4. PubMed ID: 16372795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Laboratory assessment of the Sensodyne Mikro Aktiv extra soft toothbrush and the Oral-B indicator soft toothbrush.
    Emling RC; Shi X; Yankell SL; Smith JC
    J Clin Dent; 2008; 19(2):55-8. PubMed ID: 18763687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A comparative study between the double-headed toothbrush and the single headed toothbrush in plaque removal efficiency.
    Almajed I
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 19(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 7865417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Plaque removal efficacy of a newly developed powered toothbrush in the primary dentition of pre-school children.
    Borutta A
    J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(6):151-5. PubMed ID: 9586530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparative efficacy of a new battery-powered toothbrush and an electric toothbrush on plaque removal.
    Barnes V; Battista GW; Petrone D; Petrone ME; Chaknis P; DeVizio W; Volpe AR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 2000; (31):S30-3; quiz S35. PubMed ID: 11908373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Plaque removal efficacy of the V-shaped toothbrush with new designs in bristle arrangement.
    Hanioka T; Tanaka M; Ojima M; Takaya K; Shizukuishi S
    J Clin Dent; 1999; 10(4):127-30. PubMed ID: 10825861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A comparison of the efficacy of a novel electric toothbrush and a manual toothbrush in the treatment of gingivitis.
    van der Weijden FA; Timmerman MF; Piscaer M; IJzerman Y; Warren PR; van der Velden U
    Am J Dent; 1998 Sep; 11(Spec No):S23-8. PubMed ID: 10530096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Laboratory evaluations of interproximal access of two differently bristled manual toothbrushes.
    Battista GW; Petrone DM
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(3):85-7. PubMed ID: 8003239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The clinical effect of a newly designed electric toothbrush on supragingival plaque, gingivitis and gingival bleeding.
    Stabholz A; Babayof I; Mann J
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 9238880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Interactive toothbrushing education by a smart toothbrush system via 3D visualization.
    Kim KS; Yoon TH; Lee JW; Kim DJ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Nov; 96(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 19439390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A comparative clinical investigation of the safety and efficacy of an oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush and a sonic toothbrush.
    Grossman E; Dembling W; Proskin HM
    J Clin Dent; 1995; 6(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 8694983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effectiveness of a battery-powered toothbrush on plaque removal: comparison with four manual toothbrushes.
    Bustillo E; Cartwright S; Battista GW; Petrone DM; Petrone ME; Rustogi KN; Chaknis P; Volpe AR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 2000; (31):S25-9 quiz S35. PubMed ID: 11908372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The impact of bristle profile on plaque removal efficacy of a battery-powered toothbrush.
    Biesbrock AR; Bartizek RD
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 12967068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A comparison of effectiveness in interproximal plaque removal of an electric toothbrush and a conventional hand toothbrush.
    Powers GK; Tussing GJ; Bradley RE
    Periodontics; 1967; 5(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 5225738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effectiveness of an ionic toothbrush in the removal of dental plaque and reduction on gingivitis in orthodontic patients.
    Pucher JJ; Lamendola-Sitenga K; Ferguson D; Van Swoll R
    J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr; 1999; 47(4):101-7. PubMed ID: 11830911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Dental plaque removal with two battery-powered toothbrushes.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Walters PA; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    Am J Dent; 2002 Sep; 15 Spec No():24A-27A. PubMed ID: 12512988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparing the Dr. SEDOC and ADA toothbrushes in three independent laboratory procedures.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC; Kang HC
    J Clin Dent; 2004; 15(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 15218714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Dental plaque removal effectiveness of two powered toothbrushes.
    Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jan; 17 Spec No():8A-12A. PubMed ID: 14998048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effect of an oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush and a sonic toothbrush on removal of stain from enamel surfaces.
    Schemehorn BR; Keil JC
    J Clin Dent; 1995; 6(4):194-7. PubMed ID: 8624231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The development of the toothbrush. Part 2. The modern toothbrush.
    Golding PS
    Dent Health (London); 1982; 21(5):10-11, 14-5. PubMed ID: 6964149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.