These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5216636)
21. Integral cavity preparations for silver amalgam restorations. Vlazny AL Ill Dent J; 1968 Jan; 37(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 5242488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Margin sealing and other details on dental restorations, with special attention to the peridontium]. Nyström PE Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1969 Feb; 79(2):65-86. PubMed ID: 5260994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. In vitro assessment of marginal leakage of combined amalgam-sealant restorations on occlusal surfaces of permanent posterior teeth. Fuks AB; Shey Z ASDC J Dent Child; 1983; 50(6):425-9. PubMed ID: 6581182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Relations of resin and amalgam restorations in regard to the periodontium]. Becerra Santos F Acta Clin Odontol; 1980; 3(5):9-23. PubMed ID: 6932794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [An ideal form of dental cavity preparation for amalgam restoration]. Steagall L RGO; 1979; 27(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 317749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Indications for the use of amalgam and the importance of cavity preparation]. Riethe P Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Apr; 35(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 6931805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Survey of amalgam and composite restorations in Korea. Mjör IA; Um CM Int Dent J; 1993 Aug; 43(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 8276514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of differences in amalgam restorations on examination standardization. Cobb DS J Dent Educ; 1997 Dec; 61(12):938-40. PubMed ID: 9457136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Marginal failure of amalgam. Effect of alloy selection and bite forces. Dérand T Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 6576493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fracture resistance of Class II approximal slot restorations. Yaman SD; Yetmez M; Türköz E; Akkas N J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 11005902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years. Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative study of periodontal disease in relation to approximating tooth surface to filled surface of Class II silver amalgam restorations. Srivastava RP Uttar Pradesh State Dent J; 1980 Jan; 11(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 6934639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Caries, Class V cavity preparation and amalgam fillings. Robinson AD Br Dent J; 1967 Jun; 122(12):558-62. PubMed ID: 5232031 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Preparation of class II cavity for amalgam restoration according to the R. Ingraham method]. Barlotta C Minerva Stomatol; 1965 Sep; 14(9):542-8. PubMed ID: 5215572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of amalgam bonding on resistance form of Class II amalgam restorations. Della Bona A; Summitt JB Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 9643242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]