These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Prospective memory: the relative effects of encoding, retrieval, and the match between encoding and retrieval. Hannon B; Daneman M Memory; 2007 Jul; 15(5):572-604. PubMed ID: 17613799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Age differences in encoding specificity. Puglisi JT; Park DC; Smith AD; Dudley WN J Gerontol; 1988 Nov; 43(6):P145-50. PubMed ID: 3183310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Overcoming misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: effects of encoding time and event cues. Frost P; Weaver CA Memory; 1997 Nov; 5(6):725-40. PubMed ID: 9497909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Age differences in processing: assessments of depth, elaboration and encoding-retrieval compatibility with multidimensional scaling. Anooshian LJ; Samuelson JA Int J Aging Hum Dev; 1985-1986; 22(4):271-89. PubMed ID: 3835154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Age, presentation rate, and the effectiveness of structural and semantic recall cues. Rankin JL; Hinrichs JV J Gerontol; 1983 Sep; 38(5):593-6. PubMed ID: 6886316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Relationship between cue word activation and prospective memory performance. Sugimori E; Kusumi T Psychol Rep; 2008 Feb; 102(1):317-27. PubMed ID: 18481693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [The interval between encoding and retrieval influences the environmental context dependency for a word-fragment completion task]. Yamada K; Chujo K Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2010 Apr; 81(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 20432955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Inhibitory control over no-longer-relevant information: adult age differences. Hasher L; Quig MB; May CP Mem Cognit; 1997 May; 25(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 9184480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Distinctiveness and encoding effects in online sentence comprehension. Hofmeister P; Vasishth S Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1237. PubMed ID: 25566105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Encoding and retrieval effects of dual sensory-semantic cues. Nelson DL; Borden RC Mem Cognit; 1977 Jul; 5(4):457-61. PubMed ID: 24203014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Retention of phonemic and semantic features of words. Cermak LS; Youtz CP Mem Cognit; 1976 Mar; 4(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 21287020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Context, integration, and retrieval. Baker L; Santa JL Mem Cognit; 1977 May; 5(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 24202899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Memory for pictures and words as a function of level of processing: Depth or dual coding? D'Agostino PR; O'Neill BJ; Paivio A Mem Cognit; 1977 Mar; 5(2):252-6. PubMed ID: 24202819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [The process and the operation of reflective and predictive inferences in analogical retrieval competition]. Hano Y Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1999 Dec; 70(5):375-83. PubMed ID: 10756585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effectiveness of retrieval cues in memory for words. Tulving E; Osler S J Exp Psychol; 1968 Aug; 77(4):593-601. PubMed ID: 5672271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Remembering operations. Kolers PA Mem Cognit; 1973 Sep; 1(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 24214568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Phonemic similarity and interference in short-term memory for single letters. Wickelgren WA J Exp Psychol; 1966 Mar; 71(3):396-404. PubMed ID: 5908822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]