111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5218310)
1. The significance of cervical carcinoma in situ.
Green GH
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1966 Feb; 6(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 5218310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Is cervical carcinoma in situ a significant lesion?
Green GH
Int Surg; 1967 Jun; 47(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 6033236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytology screening--a program that works.
MacLean MA
Can Nurse; 1969 May; 65(5):40-3. PubMed ID: 5769363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical cancer screening.
Anderson GH; Boyes DA
Lancet; 1987 Aug; 2(8554):339-40. PubMed ID: 2886804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical methods in a screening program for cancer.
Renwick DH
Can J Public Health; 1969 Jul; 60(7):267-78. PubMed ID: 5804452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in British Columbia: a comprehensive program for detection, diagnosis, and treatment.
Benedet JL; Anderson GH
Gynecol Oncol; 1981 Oct; 12(2 Pt 2):S280-91. PubMed ID: 7308860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Experience with cervical screening in British Columbia.
Boyes DA; Worth AJ; Anderson GH
Gynecol Oncol; 1981 Oct; 12(2 Pt 2):S143-55. PubMed ID: 7308854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Cytologic screening--an effective method].
MacLean MA
Infirm Can; 1970 Feb; 12(2):23-7. PubMed ID: 5197343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Organisation and results of the cervical cytology screening programme in British Columbia, 1955-85.
Anderson GH; Boyes DA; Benedet JL; Le Riche JC; Matisic JP; Suen KC; Worth AJ; Millner A; Bennett OM
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1988 Apr; 296(6627):975-8. PubMed ID: 3129115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Forty years of repeated screening: the significance of carcinoma in situ.
Morrison BJ; Coldman AJ; Boyes DA; Anderson GH
Br J Cancer; 1996 Sep; 74(5):814-9. PubMed ID: 8795587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The significance of cervical carcinoma in situ.
Green GH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1966 Apr; 94(7):1009-22. PubMed ID: 5910357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mass cervical cancer screening program by irrigation smear in Japan.
Kawashima Y; Ino S; Tashiro K; Tachibana M; Masukawa T
Obstet Gynecol; 1968 Jul; 32(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 5742086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The delayed diagnosis of invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Holmquist ND
J La State Med Soc; 1990 Feb; 142(2):37-9. PubMed ID: 2307896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Carcinoma of the cervix: a challenge being met.
Meisels A
Can J Med Technol; 1971 Dec; 33(6):228-9. PubMed ID: 5137614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical cancer screening data from two cohorts in British Columbia.
van Oortmarssen GJ; Habbema JD
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):47-60. PubMed ID: 3570415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The progression of pre-invasive lesions of the cervix to invasion.
Green GH
N Z Med J; 1974 Oct; 80(525):279-87. PubMed ID: 4531563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. False negative rate in mass screening for cervical cancer.
Sato S; Mikino H; Matsunaga G; Yajima A
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(3):836-7. PubMed ID: 9622728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. THE INFLUENCE OF A CYTOLOGICAL SCREENING PROGRAM UPON THE INCIDENCE OF INVASIVE SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX IN BRITISH COLUMBIA.
BRYANS FE; BOYES DA; FIDLER HK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1964 Apr; 88():898-906. PubMed ID: 14141461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. HPV: a look into new methods for high-risk testing.
Reynolds JP
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2011 Jul; 43(7):10, 12, 14; quiz 16, 18. PubMed ID: 21830652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
