These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5219639)
1. Microleakage of a new restorative material. Going RE; Sawinski VJ J Am Dent Assoc; 1966 Jul; 73(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 5219639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of in vivo and in vitro microleakage of dental restorations. McCurdy CR; Swartz ML; Phillips RW; Rhodes BF J Am Dent Assoc; 1974 Mar; 88(3):592-602. PubMed ID: 4204384 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. RELATIONSHIP OF CAVITY DESIGN TO RESTORATIVE MATERIALS. MAHLER DB; TERKLA LG Dent Clin North Am; 1965 Mar; 23():149-57. PubMed ID: 14276023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Composite resins as a dental restorative material. Johnson LN J Biomed Mater Res; 1971; 5(2):207-23. PubMed ID: 5575326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of restorative materials on plaque composition. Norman RD; Mehra RV; Swartz ML; Phillips RW J Dent Res; 1972; 51(6):1596-601. PubMed ID: 4508969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. NEW CONCEPTS IN MATERIALS USED FOR RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY. PHILLIPS RW J Am Dent Assoc; 1965 Mar; 70():652-61. PubMed ID: 14245332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Recent consensus on the pulpal reaction to restorative materials. Gilmore HW J Prosthet Dent; 1970 Apr; 23(4):434-40. PubMed ID: 4907435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. VI. Forces developing in direct-filling materials during hardening. Bowen RL J Am Dent Assoc; 1967 Feb; 74(3):439-45. PubMed ID: 5225790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Biologic considerations in the selection and use of restorative materials. Massler M J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1968 Mar; 23(3):58-69. PubMed ID: 5239659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage: a review. Kidd EA J Dent; 1976 Sep; 4(5):199-206. PubMed ID: 787027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The response of human gingiva to restorative materials. Trivedi SC; Talim ST J Prosthet Dent; 1973 Jan; 29(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 4564802 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reactions to implants of conventional and new dental restorative materials. Matsui A; Buonocore M; Sayegh F; Yamaki M J Dent Child; 1967 Sep; 34(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 5341569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study. Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recent advances in materials used in restorative dentistry. Hampson EL Dent News (Lond); 1969 Mar; 6(3):4-5. PubMed ID: 4976502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]