These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. [Symptomatic and prognostic value of radiographic examinations of the molars in orthodontics]. Netter JC Orthod Fr; 1965; 36():553-76. PubMed ID: 5249401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Cephalometric standards for normal Egyptian face. Loutfy MS; Ponitz P; Harris JE Egypt Dent J; 1971 Jan; 17(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 5281924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. [Autosomal dominant hereditary open occlusion in the teleroentgen picture]. Erpenstein H Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1968 Dec; 23(12):1370-80. PubMed ID: 5248169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. [Differential diagnosis of different forms of deep bite]. Shcherbakov AS Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1980; 59(6):54-5. PubMed ID: 7006158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. [Structure of the base of the skull in different types of bite based on teleroentgenographic data]. Shcherbakov AS; Zhulev EN; Trezubov VN Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1983; 62(3):71-3. PubMed ID: 6577722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Seven position serial cephalometric appraisal of normal growth and/or treatment. Bench RW Proc Found Orthod Res; 1972; ():137-61. PubMed ID: 4519809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. [Lateral teleradiographic diagnosis of deep bite]. Meyer E; Haase G Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1977 Dec; 32(12):927-30. PubMed ID: 271570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [The teleradiographic method of cephalometry. Importance and the advantages of the method]. Dociu I Stomatologia (Bucur); 1970; 17(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 5267783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. [The development of CCD (charge coupled device) scan X-ray cephalometric analysis system]. Ma Y; Lin J; Fu X Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1995 Mar; 30(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 7648918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. [A comparative teleroentgenographic study of cases with normal occlusion and malocclusions]. Jović M; Ozerović B; Marković M Acta Stomatol Croat; 1966; 1(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 5228331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. [A comparative study of various diagnostic roentgen-encephalometric methods]. Rönning O Suom Hammaslaak Toim; 1965; 61(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 5222685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. [Teleroentgenographic examination of normal occlusion]. Jović M; Milacić M; Tabori P Stomatol Vjesn; 1968; 2(1-6):363-9. PubMed ID: 5293761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. [Anomalies of the basal-distal relationship. II]. da Cruz JP Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac; 1984; 25(3):suppl 59-110. PubMed ID: 6515254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [Profile teleroentgenogram of the head in the daily practice of the orthodontist]. Dibelka F; Stýblová J; Vegerová B Cesk Stomatol; 1968 May; 68(3):217-20. PubMed ID: 5240578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. [Some differential aspects of Angle Class 2-1 malocclusion]. Haver TJ; Hsiang AB Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1973 Apr; 80(4):127-31. PubMed ID: 4512203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Derivation of acceptable arrangements in the Steiner analysis. Servoss JM Angle Orthod; 1971 Apr; 41(2):146-9. PubMed ID: 5280369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]