These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 522630)

  • 41. Radiation risks from nuclear power exaggerated.
    Upton AC
    N Engl J Med; 1980 May; 302(21):1205. PubMed ID: 7366664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [The function of the small intestine based on hydrogen test data in men who have been exposed to small doses of ionizing radiation in the cleanup of the sequelae of the accident at the Chernobyl Atomic Electric Power Station].
    Liubchenko PN; Dubinina EB; Petrakov AV; Bendikov EA
    Ter Arkh; 1992; 64(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 1509391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Evaluating the radiation exposure of the population as a sequela of the reactor accident in Chernobyl].
    Kaul A
    Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1987 Feb; 49(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 2952919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Chernobyl nuclear catastrophe and the high risk potential for mental retardation.
    Holowinsky IZ
    Ment Retard; 1993 Feb; 31(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 8441351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Future challenges for nuclear power plant development research, and for radiological protection sciences.
    Lazo E
    Health Phys; 2007 Nov; 93(5):560-7. PubMed ID: 18049234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Teratogenic and mutagenic effect of ionizing radiation].
    Czeizel E; Trabert G
    Orv Hetil; 1988 Sep; 129(37):1979-81. PubMed ID: 3174129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Possibilities and limitations of the predictive risk estimates and epidemiological studies following the Chernobyl incident].
    Trenta G; Muzzi A
    Ann Ig; 1989; 1(5):867-81. PubMed ID: 2483910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [The cytogenetic and clinico-hematological indices of the people subjected to mixed irradiation in the accident at the Chernobyl Atomic Electric Power Station].
    Kindzel'skiĭ LP; Demina EA; Zlochevskaia LL
    Vrach Delo; 1991 Jan; (1):32-4. PubMed ID: 2011888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Revisiting nuclear power plant safety.
    Brenner DJ
    Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5604):201-3; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 12523358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Impact of the Bohunice Nuclear Power Plant on atmospheric radiocarbon.
    Povinec PP; Sivo A; Simon J; Holý K; Chudý M; Richtáriková M; Morávek J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1686-90. PubMed ID: 18534859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Is There a Future for Nuclear Power? Wind and Emission Reduction Targets in Fossil-Fuel Alberta.
    van Kooten GC; Duan J; Lynch R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165822. PubMed ID: 27902712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The nuclear energy outlook--a new book from the OECD nuclear energy agency.
    Yoshimura U
    Health Phys; 2011 Jan; 100(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 21399406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Health evaluation of energy-generating sources. AMA Council on Scientific Affairs.
    JAMA; 1978 Nov; 240(20):2193-5. PubMed ID: 702736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The health hazard of not using nuclear power. Presented at the 2nd IPPNW European Regional Symposium Madrid, 17-19 October 1986.
    Szatmáry Z
    Med War; 1987; 3(4):211-22. PubMed ID: 3431515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Radiation risks: critical analysis and commentary.
    Barrett B; Stiles M; Patterson J
    Prev Med; 2012; 54(3-4):280-2. PubMed ID: 22227282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Some energy facts and fallacies.
    Oliver BM
    Perspect Biol Med; 1980; 23(3):335-56. PubMed ID: 7393713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Can hybrid solar-fossil power plants mitigate CO2 at lower cost than PV or CSP?
    Moore J; Apt J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Mar; 47(6):2487-93. PubMed ID: 23379665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Our energy situation - update today.
    Smith RI
    Med Res Eng; 1979; 13(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 522626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Chemical and radiological risk factors associated with waste from energy production.
    Christensen T; Fuglestvedt J; Benestad C; Ehdwall H; Hansen H; Mustonen R; Stranden E
    Sci Total Environ; 1992 Apr; 114():87-97. PubMed ID: 1594925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A US nuclear future?
    Ferguson CD; Marburger LE; Farmer JD; Makhijani A
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7314):391-3. PubMed ID: 20864972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.