These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5229900)

  • 1. [Contribution to the practical use of the method of cephalometric analysis according to Steiner].
    Bonnefont R
    Orthod Fr; 1966; 37():623-53. PubMed ID: 5229900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Basic classification of 150 dysgnathic subjects according to Ricketts, Steiner and Cervera].
    Bracco P; Vercellino V
    Minerva Stomatol; 1980; 29(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 6935500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Steiner cephalometric analysis: predicted and actual treatment outcome compared.
    Abdullah RT; Kuijpers MA; Bergé SJ; Katsaros C
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2006 May; 9(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 16764682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An orthognathic simulation system integrating teeth, jaw and face data using 3D cephalometry.
    Noguchi N; Tsuji M; Shigematsu M; Goto M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 36(7):640-5. PubMed ID: 17368000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry: an evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses.
    Papadopoulos MA; Jannowitz C; Boettcher P; Henke J; Stolla R; Zeilhofer HF; Kovacs L; Erhardt W; Biemer E; Papadopulos NA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 33(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 15978824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A method for defining targets in contemporary incisor inclination correction.
    Knösel M; Engelke W; Attin R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Sadat-Khonsari R; Gripp-Rudolph L
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 18678757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology.
    Cha BK; Lee JY; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Yoshida N
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 17513876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The Steiner-Cervera cephalometric evaluation].
    Morabito A; Lugliè PF; Columbano M; Mannias O
    Mondo Ortod; 1982; 7(4):23-6. PubMed ID: 6960251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Development of a video system for three-dimensional cephalometry and dental cast analysis].
    Wang B; Li S; Zhou L
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 May; 35(3):230-2. PubMed ID: 11780233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative study of "model discrepancies" and "cephalometric discrepancies"].
    Interlandi S; Scanavini MA
    Rev Fac Odontol Sao Paulo; 1970; 8(1):195-201. PubMed ID: 5387430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Method to verify the accuracy of model surgery and prediction tracing.
    Omura T; Glickman RS; Super S
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 9456630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Changes in crowding of teeth during adolescence. A longitudinal study using dental casts and lateral cephalometric roentgenograms].
    Kuroda Y
    Osaka Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1982 Jun; 27(1):8-45. PubMed ID: 6957580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CEPHALOMETRIC STANDARDS FOR JAPANESE ACCORDING TO THE STEINER ANALYSIS.
    MIURA F; INOUE N; SUZUKI K
    Am J Orthod; 1965 Apr; 51():288-95. PubMed ID: 14267580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between the curve of Spee and dentofacial morphology evaluated with a 3-dimensional reconstruction method in Korean adults.
    Cheon SH; Park YH; Paik KS; Ahn SJ; Hayashi K; Yi WJ; Lee SP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):640.e7-14. PubMed ID: 18456135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial anthropometrics versus cephalometry as predictors for surgical treatment in patients with Class III dentofacial deformities.
    Magalhaes AE; Stella JP; Epker BN
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 9082019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of growth impairment and orthodontic results in adult patients with clefts of palate and unilateral clefts of lip, palate and alveolus.
    Schultes G; Gaggl A; Kärcher H
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Feb; 38(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 10783444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Contribution to the use of the analytical cephalometric method of A. M. Schwartz].
    Bachratý A
    Cesk Stomatol; 1968 Jan; 68(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 5237356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics.
    Nimkarn Y; Miles PG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 9081992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the radiographic cephalometry learning process by a learning virtual object.
    Silveira HL; Gomes MJ; Silveira HE; Dalla-Bona RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 19577160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A vertical cephalometric analysis.
    Alió Sanz JJ; Iglesias Conde C
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 18092525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.